Court Rules That North Carolina Districts Are “Racially Gerrymandered” and Unconstitutional

But voters will still cast ballots in these illegal districts in November.

Chris Keane/Zuma

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

A trio of judges ruled Thursday that 28 of North Carolina’s 170 state legislative districts are unconstitutional “racial gerrymanders” and ordered the state Legislature to redraw the maps. But the change won’t come in time for the November elections, leaving voters to cast ballots in districts whose boundaries have been deemed to violate the Constitution.

The case, Covington v. the State of North Carolina, centers on whether state Republicans relied too heavily on race when they redrew the legislative districts in 2011. Thursday’s opinion, written by Judge James A. Wynn Jr., found that “race was the predominant criterion in drawing all of the challenged districts.” That alone doesn’t make a congressional district unconstitutional, but Wynn wrote that the state did “not [show] that their use of race to draw any of these districts was narrowly tailored to further a compelling state interest.”

The ruling comes less than a week after Common Cause, a public advocacy group, sued the state over alleged racially gerrymandered congressional districts. It comes less than two weeks after a separate trio of federal judges struck down a host of North Carolina voting restrictions, including voter ID requirements, cuts to early voting, and the banning of same-day voter registration. North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory, a Republican, said he was going to appeal that ruling, but that hasn’t happened yet. A separate case, McCrory v. Harris, is also challenging the state’s congressional districts.

Thursday’s ruling orders the state Legislature to redraw the legislative districts. But given that the November elections are less than four months away and state House and Senate primaries based on those districts have already taken place, the court declined to order a postponing of the 2016 general election and will instead “allow the November 2016 elections to proceed as scheduled under the challenged plans, despite their unconstitutionality.” The court acknowledged that the plaintiffs in the case, “and thousands of other North Carolina citizens, have suffered severe constitutional harms stemming from [North Carolina’s] creation of twenty-eight districts racially gerrymandered in violation of the Equal Protection Clause,” and ordered the state Legislature to redraw the boundaries during its next legislative session.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend