Cain on Student Loans: “I Don’t Have a Position”

GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain discussed student loan reform at the National Press Club on Monday. Well, not really.Courtesy of <a href="">C-Span</a>

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain just finished up a 30-minute press conference at the National Press Club in DC by singing, at the request of the moderator, “Amazing Grace.” That came just a few hours after Cain was aked at the American Enterprise Institute what fellow presidential candidate he’d dress up as for Halloween (answer: Ron Paul). But, on a day he’s been accused of possibly breaking federal campaign finance laws, and forced to respond to reports of sexual harassment, Cain was asked some nuts-and-bolts policy questions, too.

Specifically, the former talk radio host and Godfather’s pizza CEO was asked what he would do to control the rising cost of attending college—and what actions he might take to make student loans more manageable. Cain’s answers were revealing:

“The issue of addressing the expense of higher education, I happen to believe that, here again, let the free market sort it out. You have more expensive colleges and universities. You have less expensive colleges and universities. And people have a choice. Colleges and universities are competing for students… I didn’t say it was just fine. There could be some other factors, but I don’t believe that we should artificially start to tamper with the free-market system.”

Pressed in a follow-up on how he might address the ballooning costs of students loans, he answered: “I don’t have a position on what we ought to do about all of the student debt that some of the students have run up. I don’t have a position on that right now. It’s unfortunate, but it is obviously something that we are going to have to deal with.” It’s a question of immense importance, and not just for the We Are the 99 Percent folks either. Last week, President Obama announced a plan to attempt to lower the student loan burden on recent college grads. Obama’s plan might not make much of a difference, but considering student loan debts have increased 511 percent since 1999—totaling nearly a trillion dollars—it’s clearly the kind of problem that’s badly in need of a fix. Just take a look at the chart on the left, from our college guide.

It also suggests Cain hasn’t given much thought, ever, to higher education policy. There is a market when it comes to college tuition—it just so happens it’s totally dominated by the producers and not the consumers. Even as the cost of teaching has gone down, the cost of tuition has risen across the board, at a rate that far outpaces inflation, as well as (in the case of public universities) budget cuts. Rather than driving down the cost of college, the higher education market has for the last few decades been driving costs higher and higher.

This is, incidentally, the kind of question we should see more of at events like this, as well as at debates. Student loan reform is a serious topic, with a ton of money at stake (not to mention the livelihood of a lot of people in my generation), and one that candidates for the presidency should be expected to have put at least some thought into. But it’s not the kind of thing anyone in the GOP field will bring up unprompted. So kudos to the moderator for at least asking the question.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend