Minnesota: Vote Challengers Get Aggressive

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Leading up to the election, Minnesota has been a hotbed of anti-voter fraud activity, and voting rights advocates have warned that activist fraud-spotters could resort to legally dubious poll-watching tactics. Tea party activists and conservative groups have spearheaded a massive anti-fraud effort in the state called Election Integrity Watch, which has recruited 8,000 volunteers statewide. The latest reports from the ground seem to confirm fears that Election Day vigilance could turn into voter intimidation: Minnesota election officials and others are reporting that overzealous poll watchers and vote challengers are overstepping their bounds.

In Hennepin County, for instance, election officials say they’ve been dealing with “overly aggressive vote challengers,” the AP reports:

County Elections Manager Rachel Smith says precinct judges have had what she calls “very firm exchanges” with poll watchers who didn’t seem to understand their role…wandering into secure areas and challenging voters for the wrong reasons.

Smith says challengers may only sit behind the registration tables and may only challenge someone’s right to vote based on their personal knowledge, not the voter’s behavior.

An official from Minnesota Majority, one of the groups behind the conservative anti-fraud effort, said he hadn’t heard of such incidents and claimed his volunteers were trained correctly, the AP story adds. But complaints of overly aggressive Minnesota poll workers have also been reported to Election Protection, a voting rights advocacy group, which has a website for reporting election problems.

According to one complaint posted on the site by a volunteer, a poll worker in St. Paul told a Hispanic voter, “I think everyone should have to show their ID at the polls.” Minnesota does not require voters to show ID cards at the polls, but conservative activists have been lobbying to push such a law by raising fears that non-citizens would try to steal elections. The voter took the complaint to a Ramsey County election official, receiving “a email apology and an assurance that it shouldn’t have happened and election judges will be instructed to not ask for ID from voters who are already registered.”

The conservative Election Integrity Watch has spearheaded an effort to push poll workers to ID voters, even threatening to sue Minnesota state officials for banning buttons that say “Please ID me” at the polls. And they haven’t seemed to let up on their anti-fraud push on Election Day, according to another complaint about intimidation from Election Protection that was submitted to local election officials:

We received a report from Election Protection’s volunteer that a van with a large “eyeball” sign and the message “Minnesota Stop Voter Fraud” or similar statement on the sign was slowly circling the building in which the polling place is located. The van was not going with the flow of traffic and was clearly targeting the polling place; it circled the building at least twice while the volunteer was monitoring the polling place.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend