Drifting Pesticides Keep Making California Farm Workers Sick

And the fines levied against the companies doing the spraying amount to pocket change.

Airplane spraying insecticides over a farm field.chas53/iStock

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

In August, a group 167 farm workers were harvesting garlic in California’s agriculture-heavy Kern County when some of them began to feel ill. The county’s agriculture department later found that 92 of the workers “exhibited symptoms of pesticide exposure.” This week, after concluding its investigation into the issue, Kern County slapped five companies with fines for incidents relating to pesticide drift.

Two separate chemicals were being sprayed in the area that day, though only one has been linked to the sickened workers: Vapam, a fumigant applied to soil to kill microscopic pests called nematodes. The potato grower and processor Tasteful Selections was hit with a $42,000 fine for failing to tell the 167 workers in the area that the fumigant Vapam had been injected in soil nearby, KQED reports.

A Tasteful Selections spokeswoman said the company declined to comment on the incident. According to the trade publication Growing Produce, Tasteful Selections manages “9,000 acres of specialty potatoes, carrots, and garlic.” Its potatoes are “sold in 15,000 stores in all 50 states, representing 35 percent of the specialty potato market,” Growing Produce adds. 

At around the time the workers were being exposed to Vapam,  another helicopter was spraying a pesticide containing chlorpyrifos nearby, the Kern County report found. Testing done on the clothing of the sickened farmworkers did not detect chlorpyrifos, though it was being aerially sprayed nearby with the same workers present. But the county imposed a $3,850 fine against the pesticide-application company that sprayed the chemical for failing to provide advance notice of the spraying and for applying it within a quarter mile of a residential area. Chlorpyrifos is a potent neurotoxin that’s been linked to developmental issues in children. The US Environmental Protection Agency moved to ban the chemical during the waning days of the Obama administration, but Donald Trump’s EPA quickly reversed that decision, under a cloud of controversy intensified by the $1 million contribution to Trump’s inauguration made by the pesticide’s maker, Dow.

Gustavo Aguirre, Kern County coordinator of the Central California Environmental Justice Network, noted that the incident marks the third confirmed case of confirmed chlorpyrifos drift in California since the Trump EPA reversed the ban. In one, which took place in May (I covered it here), the Kern County ag department was also ultimately moved to issue $50,000 in fines after 37 cabbage pickers were sickened by exposure to the chemical. 

Paul Towers, organizing director for Pesticide Action Network, says the frequency of these incidents calls for stiffer penalties. “The fines levied against these companies amount to little more than pocket change for large-scale growers,” he said, “It’s simple—the punishment should fit the crime. Higher fines and larger no-spray zones around workers would be a much more effective deterrent to pesticide drift problems.” 

The Kern County agriculture department’s report on the August incident, which collates testimony from several affected workers, paints a grim picture of what it’s like to produce food in a pesticide-intensive region.  “We started around four [4:00] to four thirty [4:30] in the morning,” one worker reported. “I heard someone say ‘it’s raining,’ I didn’t feel anything but I could smell it. I could smell a chemical smell like a garden product. I heard a plane or helicopter I never saw it but I heard it. I did have symptoms, my head was hurting, and my eyes were itchy and really watery.” 

Another added: “My eyes were burning and they were watery, it lasted about three hours. I had a headache and was nauseated too that started about ten minutes after my eyes started burning. I felt that way for maybe a day and a half.” 


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend