Are Trump’s Attacks on Mueller Working?

The Russians are also in on the act.

Tim Sloan/AFP/Getty Images

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

As House Democrats ramp up their investigations into ties between President Donald Trump and Russia, a new Washington Post-ABC News poll has found that a clear majority of Americans support their efforts. About 6 in 10 adults want Democrats to dig into the 2016 Trump campaign’s potential collusion with Russia, financial ties between Trump and foreign governments, and Trump’s bizarre relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

However, half of respondents said they had “just some” or no confidence that a final report from special counsel Robert Mueller’s ongoing investigation into the relationship between the Trump campaign and Russia would be “fair and even-handed.” Although the survey was conducted in the days just before Mueller charged longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone with lying, obstruction, and witness tampering, that level of skepticism raises questions about whether the attacks on Mueller by Trump and his allies have sowed doubt about whether the special counsel is being a partisan prosecutor, which has no basis in fact.

For two years, the president has sought to discredit the Russia investigations as a “witch hunt”—a phrase he has tweeted more than 160 times over the past two years, according to the Trump Twitter Archive, including twice since Stone’s indictment Friday.

Trump has also specifically gone after Mueller himself: A day after Mueller’s team said that Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, had breached a plea agreement and repeatedly lied to them, Trump attacked Mueller as a “conflicted prosecutor gone rogue.”

“The Fake News Media builds Bob Mueller up as a Saint, when in actuality he is the exact opposite,” Trump tweeted in November, arguing that Mueller “is only looking at one side and not the other.”

Meanwhile, in a report published last month, cybersecurity firm New Knowledge found that multiple Russian-directed social-media accounts have long used similar attacks. In 2017, as journalists began to further uncover disinformation spread by the Internet Research Agency—the Russian propaganda operation whose principals Mueller eventually indicted—IRA accounts began targeting the Trump-Russia investigations. “It used derision and disparagement,” New Knowledge researchers concluded, “to create and amplify the narrative that the whole investigation was nonsense, that Comey and Mueller were corrupt, and that the emerging Russia stories were a ‘weird conspiracy’ pushed by ‘liberal crybabies.'”

Partisan suspicions that Trump and the Russians have attempted to sow about Mueller may have had other effects. While most Americans support the ongoing House investigations, 46 percent said they believe Democrats will go “too far” in their efforts to investigate Trump. And Americans have cooled on impeachment, according to the Washington Post-ABC News poll; a majority believes that Democratic lawmakers should continue to hold off on impeachment proceedings, based on what is currently in the public record.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend