Donald Trump Lashes Out at “Loudmouth” John Brennan

It never ends.

Donald Trump

Ting Shen/Xinhua via ZUMA

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

President Donald Trump isn’t backing down from his widely condemned decision to revoke the security clearance of John Brennan, who served as CIA director under President Barack Obama. Brennan has been a vocal Trump critic, describing the president’s July press conference with Vladimir Putin—in which Trump cast doubt on his own intelligence agencies’ assessment that Russia had interfered with the 2016 election—as “nothing short of treasonous.”

On Saturday, Trump tweeted that Brennan would “go down as easily the WORST [CIA director] in history & since getting out, he has become nothing less than a loudmouth, partisan, political hack.” Trump—who last year revealed what the Washington Post described as “highly classified information” to Russian officials during an Oval Office meeting—added that Brennan “cannot be trusted with the secrets to our country!”

The White House, meanwhile, is reportedly preparing to revoke the clearances of a number of other current and former officials who served under Obama, many of whom were involved in the Russia investigation. The Post reported Friday evening, citing a White House source, that Trump’s top communications officials have “discussed the optimum times to release them as a distraction during unfavorable news cycles” but that other Trump aides worried that “the threatened revocations smack of a Nixonian enemies list, with little or no substantive national security justification.”

In an open letter to Trump Thursday, retired Admiral William McRaven—the former head of US Joint Special Operations Command—praised Brennan and blasted Trump’s decision to revoke his clearance. “I would consider it an honor if you would revoke my security clearance as well,” McRaven wrote, “so I can add my name to the list of men and women who have spoken up against your presidency.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest