AP: Paul Manafort Covertly Worked to “Greatly Benefit” Putin’s Interests

Newly unearthed documents link Trump’s former campaign manager to a Russian billionaire.

Carlo Allegri/Reuters/ZUMA

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Paul Manafort, who ran President Donald Trump’s campaign from April to August 2016, secretly worked to “greatly benefit” Russian President Vladimir Putin’s interests a decade ago, according to documents obtained by the Associated Press.

In 2006, Manafort signed a $10 million annual contract with Russian oligarch and Putin ally Oleg Deripaska to “influence politics, business dealings and news coverage inside the United States, Europe and the former Soviet republics to benefit the Putin government,” the AP reports.

“We are now of the belief that this model can greatly benefit the Putin government if employed at the correct levels with the appropriate commitment to success,” Manafort wrote to Deripaska, an aluminum magnate, in a 2005 strategy memo.

The bombshell report appears to contradict Manafort’s repeated denials that he worked to advance Russian political interests. The longtime lobbyist and onetime partner of Trump ally Roger Stone was forced to resign as Trump’s campaign chairman after multiple reports revealed his work for deposed Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych and his pro-Russian Ukrainian party, including allegations (denied by Manafort) of $12.7 million in undisclosed payments made to Manafort.

Shortly after the AP’s report, Manafort confirmed he had previously worked for Deripaska but claimed it did not involve representing “Russian political interests.”

White House press secretary Sean Spicer attempted to downplay Manafort’s role within the Trump campaign as “very limited” on Monday, the same day FBI Director James Comey confirmed to the House Intelligence Committee that the bureau was investigating the Trump campaign in conjunction with its broader probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

This is a breaking news story. We will update as more information becomes available. 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest