Here’s the Democrats’ Best Case for a Trump-Russia Investigation

The top Democrat on the intelligence committee lays out the timeline of Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.)Aaron P. Bernstein/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

At the start of Monday’s hearing on Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the House intelligence committee, laid out why the hearing was so important.

Schiff, a former federal prosecutor, offered a detailed timeline of Russia’s role in the election during a 15-minute opening statement ahead of the committee’s questioning of FBI Director James Comey and National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers. The American public will never know whether Russian meddling swung the election, Schiff said, but there are some things that are known that deserve further exploration.

“What was happening in July/August of last year? And were US persons involved?”

“We do know this: The months of July and August 2016 appear to have been pivotal,” Schiff said. “It was at this time that the Russians began using the information they had stolen to help Donald Trump and harm Hillary Clinton. And so the question is why? What was happening in July/August of last year? And were US persons involved?”

Schiff laid out details from the series of memos authored by a former Western intelligence operative detailing possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence. He highlighted the behavior of former Trump campaign national security adviser Carter Page, who reportedly traveled to Moscow on what Schiff described as a “trip approved by the Trump campaign” and met with the CEO of a Russian corporation who is reportedly a “former KGB agent and close friend” of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Schiff also pointed to allegations in the memos that the Trump campaign was offered documents damaging to Hillary Clinton in exchange for, as Schiff put it, “a Trump Administration policy that de-emphasizes Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and instead focuses on NATO countries not paying their fair share—policies which, even as recently as the President’s meeting last week with Angela Merkel, have now presciently come to pass.” 

Prior to the hearing, Trump tweeted that allegations that his campaign colluded with Russian officials are “FAKE NEWS” and that Democrats “made up and pushed the Russian story as an excuse for running a terrible campaign.”

Schiff closed his statement by pointing out why the Congress must thoroughly investigate Russian interference in the election. “Only by understanding what the Russians did can we inoculate ourselves from the further Russian interference we know is coming,” Schiff said. “Only then can we help protect our European allies who are, as we speak, enduring similar Russian interference in their own elections.”

Read the full statement below:



Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend