Remember When Trump Said He Was Audited Because He Was a Christian?

Maybe claiming a $916 million loss had something to do with it.

Chris Pizzello/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Many people say that Donald Trump speaks with no regard for accuracy or consequences. With the recent news that Trump declared a $916 million loss on his 1995 tax returns and possibly exploited a loophole to not pay federal income taxes for 18 years, one of those instances of Trump mouthing off deserves to be reexamined.

During a GOP primary debate in February, Trump claimed that he was not releasing his tax returns because he was being audited by the IRS. Immediately after the slugfest, CNN’s Chris Cuomo asked the reality television star on air about this, and Trump replied:

The one problem I have is that I’m always audited by the IRS, which I think is very unfair. I don’t know, maybe because of religion, maybe because of something else, maybe because I’m doing this, although this is just recently.

Religion? Trump was being audited because of his religion? Really? Cuomo asked for an explanation: “What do you mean religion?” Trump went on:

Well, maybe because of the fact that I’m a strong Christian, and I feel strongly about it and maybe there’s a bias.

An incredulous Cuomo pressed the matter: “You think you can get audited for being a strong Christian?” And Trump responded, “Well, you see what’s happened. You have many religious groups that are complaining about that. They’ve been complaining about it for a long time.”

This was some allegation. No major presidential candidate had ever charged that he was being targeted by a federal agency because of his religious beliefs.

Later that evening, CNN’s Anderson Cooper pushed Trump on this, asking if he truly thought the IRS was after him because of his Christian beliefs. Trump appeared to backpedal a bit, answering: “Well, I know they certainly had a lot of problems, I mean, if you look at what’s been happening over the years. I don’t think, I don’t think it applies.” He still insisted he had been unfairly targeted for the audit: “But I can tell you one thing: I am audited when I shouldn’t be audited…Why is it that every single year, I’m audited, whereas other people that are very rich, people are never audited?”

Now the public knows this was merely fact-free posturing. According to the New York Times report—the accuracy of which has not been challenged by Trump or his campaign—the real estate mogul took nearly a $1 billion loss in a move that could have erased his federal income tax obligation for almost the next two decades. So when Trump was playing the Christian card and accusing the IRS of religious bias (without providing a crumb of evidence), he certainly knew that the IRS had plenty of legitimate reasons for giving his tax returns a damn careful review. And even when he backed off this claim, he still moaned that he had been unfairly selected for an audit. Yet due to his billion-dollar scheme, of all American taxpayers (or non-taxpayers), Trump perhaps most deserved auditing.

Trump’s statements from February now look absolutely ridiculous—and they are further indication that Trump cannot be trusted to speak truthfully about his taxes and finances.

Watch Trump claim the IRS was after him because of his religious views:


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend