Congress Wants to Make Sure You Don’t Have Coverage for This Medical Procedure

The House passed a bill protecting anti-abortion health professionals in California.

AP Photo/Cliff Owen

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The Conscience Protection Act, a bill that aims to circumvent a California Department of Managed Health Care requirement that insurance companies pay for elective abortions, passed yesterday in the US House of Representatives in a 245-182 vote, mostly along party lines.

The measure claims the 2014 California order violates the Hyde Amendment, which bars the use of Medicaid for abortion coverage, and the Weldon Amendment, which prevents federal funds from going to a state that discriminates against a “health care entity that does not provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.”

The bill prevents “penalizing or discriminating against a health care provider based on the provider’s refusal to be involved in, or provide coverage for, abortion.” It was introduced to the House by Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.), who is known for her anti-abortion stance and her role as a member of the controversial Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives, a House committee formed in the wake of last summer’s Planned Parenthood sting videos.

“We wouldn’t force nonsmokers to buy cigarettes for themselves or others. We wouldn’t force vegetarians to buy meat,” said Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.). “And we shouldn’t force those who oppose abortion to pay for abortions.”

In 2014, seven California insurance providers were notified by Gov. Jerry Brown’s administration that state law does not permit them to offer coverage that limits or excludes elective abortions from their covered services. The department sent letters asserting abortion was a “basic health care service” under California law. The action came after faculty members at Santa Clara University and Loyola Marymount University complained about the limitation in their insurance coverage.

The insurance companies ultimately complied, but anti-abortion advocates such as the Life Legal Defense Foundation, Cardinal Newman Society, and the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights filed a complaint with the department, citing the Weldon Amendment. The Office for Civil Rights at the Department of Health and Human Services considered the complaints for two years, ultimately deciding last month that the order did not violate a religious freedom law and could not apply to the California insurers because they were willing to provide abortion coverage to their other customers.

Democrats argued that in this measure, the GOP projected its religious values onto medical professionals, and that current law already protects physicians who have a moral conflict from having to perform an abortion. They are referring to a few Department of Health and Human Services provisions that offer such protection, including the Affordable Care Act, which states “no qualified health plan offered through an Exchange may discriminate against any individual health care provider or health care facility because of its unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.” They argued the bill could open a window for a physician to withhold medical information that may motivate a patient to opt for an abortion.

“Congress needs to stop interfering in women’s health decisions once and for all,” said Diana DeGette (D-Colo.).

If the bill were to pass the Senate and reach President Barack Obama’s desk, he would likely veto it, since the Department of Health and Human Services has already found California’s policy to be constitutional.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend