President Obama on San Bernardino: It Is “Possible” Attack Was Terrorist-Related

In the wake of the deadly rampage in San Bernardino, California, President Barack Obama spoke from the Oval Office on Thursday to say that while it was “possible” Wednesday’s attack was related to terrorism, authorities have yet to determine the motivations behind the shooting. The president also announced that the FBI has officially taken over the investigation. 

“At this stage we do not yet know why this terrible event occurred,” Obama said, surrounded by members of his national security team. “We do know that the two individuals who were killed were equipped with weapons and appeared to have additional weaponry in their homes. But we don’t know why they did it. We don’t know at this point the extent of their plans. We do not know their motivations” 

“It is possible this was terrorist related but we don’t know,” he added. “It’s also possible this was work related.”

The president concluded his remarks by urging lawmakers to enact legislation aimed at making it more difficult for potential mass shooters to obtain weapons.

“We all have a part to play,” he said. “As the investigation moves forward, it’s important for all of us, including our legislators, to see what we can do.”

On Wednesday, 14 people were killed by two gunmen inside Inland Regional Services, a center that assists individuals with developmental disabilities. Two suspects, identified as Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, are believed to have opened fire inside the building where a Christmas party was taking place, before fleeing the scene inside an SUV. An hours-long manhunt concluded with the two being killed by authorities.

As news of Wednesday’s shooting began to unfold, Obama was sitting down for a pre-scheduled interview with CBS, where he reminded Americans that the country’s mass shootings pattern has “no parallel” abroad.

“We should never think that this is something that just happens in the ordinary course of events, because it doesn’t happen with the same frequency in other countries,” Obama said.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend