The Donald Trump Firestorm Comes to Pennsylvania Avenue

Trump may not reach the White House, but the fallout from his remarks about immigrants is getting close.

Miles E. Johnson

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Loose lips sink ships—or in the case of the Donald Trump’s latest controversy, they sink lucrative business partnerships. Macy’s, ESPN, and NBC are among the businesses that have severed ties with the tycoon/reality TV star running for president after his comments denigrating Mexican immigrants as rapists and drug traffickers. And now the fallout is hitting closer to the place he’d like to call home.

Trump is currently transforming Washington, DC’s Old Post Office Pavilion—which is a mere five blocks from the White House—into a luxury hotel. But politics is getting in the way of business. On Wednesday, acclaimed restaurateur José Andrés announced he would no longer be opening a planned restaurant in the hotel, citing Trump’s offensive remarks. On Thursday, the New York Times reported that Geoffrey Zakarian, a chef and partner at several Manhattan restaurants, decided to cancel his plans to open a branch of his brasserie-style restaurant the National in the new hotel, explaining that Trump’s statements “do not in any way align with my personal core values.” Hours later, close to one hundred community leaders and Washington residents converged on the hotel site to protest Trump’s remarks, and they demanded that his name be removed from the development, which bears a gigantic blue sign bearing his name.

“We want to send a strong message that we are against hatred and xenophobia.”

The protest brought out a number of local elected officials. Franklin Garcia, the district’s “shadow representative” in Congress (which has no voting representative from DC) said that the aim of the protest was to pressure additional companies to sever ties with Trump and to urge Trump to apologize for his remarks.

“We all share the same passions for making America as great as it is,” Garcia told the crowd near the hotel. “We want to send a strong message that we are against hatred and xenophobia.”

D.C shadow senator Paul Strauss issued a plea to the Department of the Interior, given that the land under the hotel is owned by the government: “We ask the DOI to take that logo off that scaffolding, on the building that belongs to the people.”

The logo is causing its own problems. The facade of the hotel is covered in a placard that reads, “COMING 2016: TRUMP,” with his name in characteristically huge letters. (Trump’s team has said that the project, conveniently, is expected to be completed near the time of the presidential election next fall.)

“We ask the DOI to take that logo off that scaffolding, on the building that belongs to the people.”

That prominently displayed sign has led some residents to wonder if Trump is using the hotel project as advertising for his campaign. “Because this is, and because presumably this is an accurate estimate of when the hotel would be done, I’m assuming this would be legitimate signage,” says Paul Ryan of the Campaign Legal Center, casting doubt on the notion that the sign violates any laws. “But if I were at the FEC and we got a complaint about this, I would want to know if other developments had similar signage.” And in fact, other Trump buildings opening next year don’t share that language on their signage. In Vancouver, a Trump Hotel is set to open in 2016, but the signs do not say “Coming 2016.” At Trump’s most recently completed Chicago project, there was also no such message.

Even if Trump didn’t intend to link the signage to his bid to inhabit the building down the street, Strauss’ fellow shadow senator, Michael Brown, is making that connection. “We don’t want his name on our building,” Brown said at the protest, “and we certainly don’t want him at 1600 Penn.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend