These GOP Candidates Are Standing Behind Donald Trump

Most of the Republican hopefuls have condemned the billionaire’s anti-immigrant rhetoric. Not these guys.

Donald Trump: <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/notionscapital/18257524783/in/photolist-tPmA34-9KD2iF-5AZPwL-fNcrqH-4r8psj-9DUP8C-5xCNXa-66xQUQ-9RSFjp-9KFPLS-9KD26B-9KD2jM-9KFQ8q-9KFPXJ-9KD28v-9KD1Xt-9KFPGN-9KD23n-9KFPYo-9KFPQS-9KFQ7u-9KD1PF-9KD1SP-9bDCk2-6Vfoi4-5eHCFB-gLqZb-5w3H5-5HNnWj-9KD2dP-9KFPFb-9VQfNH-5sT5hx-5JLUuw-5JLMXf-tw8QHm-6iV6JB-66T1Y9-5JLEXY-5JM8ff-66NHZR-5j2evq-5JFxUF-6eZjV7-66T273-66NJhv-66NJ8X-66T1NQ-5V8833-5V3Dhk">Mike Licht</a>/Flickr; Ben Carson: Regina H. Boone/Zuma; Rick Santorum: Richard Ellis/Zuma; Ted Cruz: Jerry Mennenga/Zuma; US-Mexican Border: <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/omaromar/3085615383/in/photolist-5GEzXe-5CraXy-q8xAGN-68NYri-nA16Mr-Buz7f-qqUZFH-Buzd3-2ci6ZU-qnQ8hC-qnQ6hA-qr5XLV-q8xAaq-q8yuSw-qoNQaN-qoNTs9-pu6Jem-294oM-rGt55g-puk7v8-pukbnM-5GJSgo-5GEzA2-29GTK-5Bq1HV-8YEqFJ-5koxwG-qqUT2v-qq7ct8-BuwHg-2HQW44-9ery4Y-35Fe3h-w9Qg-r4mpWf-qPqF7B-chZ3SN-68DZKE-aCdL2S-5GJRXm-cygLSJ-29GQu-pSLYY-3vgJg-5jeuM5-74tjp-29GYw-voAWS-rEnngq-294rd"> Omar Bárcena</a>/Flickr

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Following Donald Trump’s controversial comments suggesting that Mexican immigrants are “rapists” who bring drugs and crime to America, his fellow 2016 contenders have largely condemned his inflammatory remarks. But a handful of Republican hopefuls have either defended the real estate mogul or, in one case, fled a question on the subject to avoid going on the record.

Rick Santorum, Ted Cruz, and Ben Carson are standing behind Trump. They have defended (even applauded) the billionaire, in what might be attempts to appeal to conservatives opposed to immigration reform.

During an appearance on Meet the Press on Sunday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said, “I salute Donald Trump for focusing on the need to address illegal immigration.” He chalked up Trump’s divisive rhetoric as a “colorful way of speaking.” According to Cruz, the controversy is merely an attempt by the media to get Republicans to criticize each other, but he is “not interested in Republican-on-Republican violence” and therefore “ain’t gonna do it.”

Rick Santorum also came out on #teamtrump. The former senator told CBS’ Face the Nation on Sunday that he did not like Trump’s “verbiage,” but said that Trump “focused on a very important issue for American workers, and particularly legal immigrants in this country.”

Referring to the storm that followed Trump’s remarks, Ben Carson contended that political correctness was overshadowing the debate about immigration reform. “It’s the P.C. police out in force,” Carson told the Daily Caller. “They want to make very clear that this is a topic you’re not supposed to bring up.” Carson, a former neurosurgeon, said that “our illegal immigration problem,” not Trump, should be the focus of attention. His solution? “Secure all our borders—north, south, east and west,” with electronic surveillance devices, drones, or people.

Rand Paul isn’t exactly on #teamtrump, but he has been conspicuously silent on Trump’s remarks. Last week, an Iowa voter posted a video to Twitter that showed her asking Paul for his opinion on Trump’s statement and being met with no reply.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest