Republican David Perdue Wins Georgia Senate Race

The former CEO beat the Democrats’ best hope for a pickup.

Jon-Michael Sullivan/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

There weren’t many bright spots on the map for Democrats this year. But in Georgia, the party was hoping that Senate candidate Michelle Nunn might harness the state’s changing demographics for an upset against GOP nominee David Perdue.

The state’s growing black population, however, and a mammoth effort by Democrats to register these new voters, weren’t enough to boost Nunn to victory. And on Tuesday, Nunn appeared to lose to Perdue handily. This wasn’t a huge surprise: In recent weeks, Nunn’s support slipped among Georgia’s white voters. Nunn needed to win over about a third of them, in addition to drawing a record number of black voters, in order to have a realistic shot of winning the race.

Nunn would have been Democrats’ only pickup in the Senate in an otherwise bleak election. Perdue and Nunn were competing for the seat held by the retiring Chambliss.

Republicans and Democrats both ran huge, data-driven voter mobilization campaigns in Georgia in response to a small but steady shift in the state’s demographics. But local GOP officials may have given Republicans an edge by using dubious reasoning to purge the state’s existing voter rolls of untold numbers of black residents.

The New Georgia Project, a nonpartisan group with Democratic connections, collected applications to register more than 86,000 mostly young and minority residents. But in October, the group discovered that 40,000 of those potential voters never appeared on the voter rolls. New Georgia Project blamed the missing applications on Republican Secretary of State Brian Kemp. But a judge declined to force Kemp to register the missing voters, meaning those voters would have to cast provisionary ballots.

Any Democrat still would have faced long odds in Georgia. Nunn had an edge thanks to resume. Nunn spent several years as CEO of Points of Light, a non-profit volunteer corps with roots in a service initiative started by President George H. W. Bush. And her father is a popular former senator, Sam Nunn.

Nunn’s chances looked best early on in the race, when she faced a Republican primary field of Todd Akins-in-waiting—including one candidate, Georgia Rep. Phil Gingrey, who said that Akin was “partly right” about “legitimate rape.” Perdue, however, who won the GOP nomination in July, is a sober-seeming former CEO. He touted his work as a “job creator” and led in most polls against Nunn throughout the race.

But Perdue’s past as a business leader presented its own controversy. In early October, reports emerged that Perdue spent most of his career—as he put it—outsourcing. “Defend it? I’m proud of it,” he told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, when questioned on his outsourcing record. Nunn’s campaign and EMILY’s List, a political group that supports female Democrats, spent millions of dollars airing several ads about Perdue’s record on women. The ads focused on the fact that Dollar General paid its female store managers less than male managers while Perdue was CEO.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend