5 Directors Who Should Have Directed “The Great Gatsby” Instead of Baz Luhrmann

Warner Bros. Pictures

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The Great Gatsby
Warner Bros. Pictures
142 minutes

The new adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s American classic/required high school reading The Great Gatsby is exactly how I remember the book: With a hip-hop-tinged drunken pillow fight in 3-D starring sweaty Tobey Maguire.

As an elevator pitch, there is absolutely nothing wrong with Baz Luhrmann‘s ultra-modern take on The Great Gatsby. His thoroughly modern update of Shakespeare—which, like Gatsby, stars Leonardo DiCaprio—is a joy. Plus, the timelessness of the 1925 novel makes any playful anachronisms (rap and rock music in the soundtrack, grinding dancing, and so forth) all the less suspicious.

But the result is almost unforgivably terrible, gratingly earnest in a way that the novel never was. When classic lines of narration from the beloved book start floating directly at your face as a 3-D special effects gimmick, it’s a challenge not to groan audibly in your seat.

There are more than enough people writing about every specific reason this movie sucks. Here’s my CliffsNotes version: The Great Gatsby, Leo Edition lacks the flair and dizzying, captivating qualities that made Luhrmann’s excess-pumped Moulin Rouge! and Romeo + Juliet so memorable. However stylishly garish and roaring the film thinks it is, the emotionally hollow and (ultimately) creatively lazy execution makes everything seem like the Whimpering Twenties. The film has precisely one good scene, in which the rich people argue in a New York hotel suite. The only fascinating thing about The Great Gatsby, Leo Edition is that Daisy Buchanan—famous in literary circles and book-club huddles for being maybe the single most irritating character in the history of characters—is for the most part made into a tolerable and sympathetic person. (This is a testament to the considerable skills of actress Carey Mulligan, if anything.)

In the coming days, you’ll be hearing a lot of whining, from people who are paid to write things on the internet about how punishingly bad the new Gatsby movie is. That is, if you haven’t heard already.

This all makes me wonder what could have been. Here are five ways the 2013 version of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s classic would have turned out better—if only one of these guys had been signed on to direct.

1. Michael Bay‘s Gatsformers

“So we beat on, boats against the current, fucking the prom queen.”

Plot: Jay Gatsby, the original “doer,” teams up with Nick Carraway to illegally invade Cuba. Once settled in occupied territory, the pair throws large orgies in a murdered drug lord‘s mansion, shortly before shooting to death Tom Buchanan, Daisy’s wealthy and abusive white supremacist husband who subsists on a steady diet of old money. Gatsby wins Daisy’s heart in the end after all.

2. Harmony Korine‘s Great Gatsbers

Harmony Korine Spring Breakers

Shotpress/ZUMA Press

Old spooooorrrrrrrtttt…”

Given Korine’s latest directorial effort, Spring Breakers, he and Gatsby would be a perfect fit. James Franco in Spring Breakers is Jay Gatsby, but with fake teeth and without the monogamy: a lovesick young man who has amassed a large fortune dealing in controlled substances, and whose entire world typifies the excess and implosive downside of the American Dream.

If you’ve seen Korine’s Spring Breakers, you’ve already seen a far superior version of Luhrmann’s The Great Gatsby, so save your money.

3. Lena Dunham‘s Tiny Gatsby

Lena Dunham


“…a great number of single GIRLS dancing individualistically…”

On second thought, I retract this suggestion in its entirety, simply because Lena Dunham’s output tends to be profoundly bland and unstoppably irritating. She does, however, have much experience navigating the urban tragedies of New York and documenting the day-to-day lives of young women who’ve reached a critical-mass level of annoyance that can only be characterized as Daisyesque.

Terrence Malick’s The Great Gatsby

Terrence Malick

Terrence Malick, via IMDB

I’m actually dead serious about this one. Malick is one of the greatest filmmakers ever, and he’s still alive. If his 1998 war film The Thin Red Line—a loose adaptation of James Jones’ novel—is any indication, the man certainly has no trouble turning a book into a highly lauded epic film.

There really isn’t a punch line here.

4. Judd Apatow’s This Is Gatsby

Judd Apatow

David Shankbone/Wikimedia Commons

“He knew women early and since they spoiled him he became contemptuous of them, of 40-year-old virgins because they were ignorant…”

This would at least guarantee some dick jokes.

5. Tyler Perry’s House of Gatz

Tyler Perry Madea


“In my younger and more vulnerable years my father gave me some advice that I’ve been turning over in my mind ever since: ‘Don’t be afraid o’ no po-po.'”

This should be self-explanatory.

Got your own director suggestions? Let’s chat about them in the comments below (or tweet them at me).

Now here’s a theatrical trailer for The Great Gatsby, Leo Edition, which makes the film look exponentially better and more fun than it is:

The Great Gatsby gets a wide release on Friday, May 10. The film is rated PG-13 for some violent images, sexual content, smoking, partying, and brief language. Click here for local showtimes and tickets.

Click here for more movie and TV coverage from Mother Jones.

To read more of Asawin’s reviews, click here.

To listen to the movie and pop-culture podcast that Asawin co-hosts with ThinkProgress critic Alyssa Rosenberg, click here.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend