Occupy vs. Tea Party: The Google Smackdown

In the battle for America’s attention, the Occupy movement rocketed past the tea party this fall and remains in the lead, though not by much anymore. Here’s a chart from Google Trends comparing the dueling movements’ Google hits (top graph) and news mentions (bottom graph):

(The letters A-F are automatically generated by Google Trends)

Here’s my best guess of what accounts for the peaks:

A: Congress reaches a debt ceiling compromise, capping a wave of stories about the intransigence of the tea party caucus.

B: Citing sanitation concerns, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg threatens to evict Occupy Wall Street. But after occupiers scrub down the park and thousands of sympathizers turn out to defend them, the mayor backs down.

E: Occupy Wall Street is evicted.

So the occupy movement has gradually fallen off the front pages, but what about the political issues it brought to light? The following graphs suggest that “income inequality” continues to rival “federal debt” as a leading point of conversation, especially in the news media:

B: Culmination of the federal debt ceiling fight

D to E: The heyday of OWS coverage

F: Obama’s State of the Union address focuses on income inequality.

Though these charts have limits as barometers of public sentiment, the Occupy and tea party movements are clearly locked in a close race for attention. If anything, the charts might overstate the influence of the the tea party, which is getting a bump right now as the media obsesses over the GOP presidential primaries. And if Occupy makes good on its plans for an American Spring, it could easily hit the front pages again.

Of course, getting attention isn’t the same as getting results. Just ask Ron Paul, who easily bests his rivals in Google hits despite having virtually no chance of winning the GOP nomination. The question for activists and politicos is how grow the Occupy movement into a formula for change. The answer to that probably can’t be found on Google. 

Front page image: Roxanne Jo Mitchell; David Shankbone


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend