Eyeing Medicaid, Republicans Sharpen Their Knives

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

While Congress is still mired in a debate about funding the government for the rest of the year, Republicans are planning to raise the stakes even higher. Having rolled out their spending plan for the rest of 2011—their controversial budget that guts $61 billion in spending—the GOP also has drastic plans for their 2012 budget. Politico’s Mike Allen reports that they’re planning to go after entitlement spending.

House Republicans plan to introduce their budget — the new majority’s biggest counter yet to President Obama — in the first week of April, possibly slipping to the following week. Aides tell us the budget will include, in order of specificity, plans to rein in the cost of Medicaid (quite specific), Medicare (also detailed, and branded as “Medicare 2.0,” a modernization of the program), and Social Security (more vague).

Despite deep rifts that have opened up in the party over the budget, it still looks like the GOP is itching to continue the fight. Half of Senate Republicans have vowed not to raise the debt ceiling for the government unless there are cuts to Social Security as well—a prospect that liberal Senate Democrats say is a non-starter. 

Knowing that any real cuts to Social Security will result in immediate deadlock, Republicans are looking elsewhere. Based on Allen’s account, it seems clear that the party’s plans to slash Medicaid are going to be the most concrete—and most drastic. As I’ve reported earlier, they’ll probably propose converting the health care entitlement for the poor into a “block-grant” system that will allow states to slash benefits and beneficiaries from the rolls. 

When it comes to Medicare, there are signs that they’ll push privatized solutions—perhaps reviving Medicare Advantage, which allows private insurers to peddle plans to seniors, as former McCain campaign advisor Doug Holtz-Eakin’s American Action Forum is discussing with members of Congress this week. But when it comes to courting senior voters, drastic cuts to entitlements is still political kryptonite, making the GOP unlikely to push a full voucherization of Medicare as Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) has proposed, and it’s not surprising that reforms to Social Security will remain “vague.” But when it comes to cutting benefits to lower-income families—well, that’s another story.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend