Reid’s Surging Where It Counts: Independents Victoria Burke

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Out in Nevada, the Harry Reid-Sharron Angle slugfest will almost surely be decided by the state’s growing bloc of centrist, undecided voters. They’re the ones possibly pissed at Reid for helping to pass a massive health insurance reform bill, but also put off by Angle’s right-wing extremism and propensity for rhetorical gaffes (rape and incest victims should just make “a lemon situation into lemonade,” the unemployed are “spoiled”, etc.) In Reid’s case, those independents are crucial to his success. “That’s who’s driving his negatives, the people who voted for him six years ago and now say he’s too much a part of the Washington establishment,” says University of Nevada-Reno political scientist Eric Herzik. “If he can woo them back, he wins.”

According to a new poll, Reid’s beginning to do just that. His support among independents has climbed from 24 percent to 38 percent, Public Policy Polling reported today. And when stacked next to his tea party-endorsed candidate, Reid’s standing among independents looks even rosier, the PPP poll found:

Where Lowden had led Reid 62-27 with independents, Angle has only a 51-41 advantage. Where [Sue] Lowden had held Reid to a 75-17 lead with Democratic voters, Angle’s nomination has allowed him to expand that to 85-10.

If Reid can keep clawing back more support from independents—especially those who’ve voted for him before—by highlighting Angle’s extreme positions and touting the bacon he’s brought back to Nevada, then you’ll see that independent support continue climbing. And come November, that independent backing could be the difference between a narrow victory or an embarrassing loss for Harry Reid.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend