5 More Questions For BP

US Coast Guard

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Today the Energy and Commerce Committee is grilling CEOs from the nation’s top five oil companies, to be followed by even more smoke and fire on Thursday when BP CEO Tony Hayward takes the hot seat for the first time. The Committee, led by Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA), has honed in on five “serious questions” about potential screw-ups aboard the rig. But a story that I’ve published today suggests that Congressional investigators should add a sixth line of questioning: Did BP’s rig pass a key safety test—or not?

Spokesman for BP, Halliburton, and Transocean won’t talk to me. If I had the chance, here’s what I’d ask them:

  1. BP has given conflicting statements about how many negative pressure tests—key procedures that test the integrity of the well casings—were performed aboard the Deepwater Horizon before the explosion. At times, the company has suggested that two tests were performed, and at other times that three or more “pressure tests” were performed. So what is BP’s official position?
  2. Halliburton service supervisor Christopher Haire has testified that workers on the rig floor, where the platform’s drilling equipment was set up, told him that a third test was performed. But Haire’s attorney says his pressure gauges indicated that a third test never took place. This suggests that a third test might have been done improperly or even fabricated. If BP still maintains that a third test was performed, what evidence does it have that a third test took place?
  3. Halliburton has released results for only two negative pressure tests. What was the result of the third test?
  4. Were the results of the negative pressure tests approved by BP’s US headquarters in Houston? If so, why were they approved when BP has acknowledged that the results of the first two tests were unsatisfactory?
  5. Several rig workers have described a confrontation between Transocean’s rig installation manager, Jimmy Harrell, and BP officials aboard the rig on the day of the disaster. While Harrell has downplayed the conflict, other workers have suggested that BP was ignoring his safety concerns. Exactly what transpired during this conflict?



Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend