Student Loan Reform Sellout?

Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

This past week, fellow MoJo blogger Andy Kroll and I wrote about student loan reform and how the new law’s provisions correlate to Obama’s support, or lack thereof, for community colleges. I argued that Obama’s decision to sign the bill at a Virginia community college signaled a symbolic reaffirmation of his support for these overenrolled, underfunded, two-year colleges. Before this week, the president had scarcely mentioned community colleges since challenging them last summer to graduate five million more students by 2020. But Andy made the excellent point that the bill Obama signed is missing the $12 billion the prez proposed to help community colleges meet his challenge.

The version passed by the House last fall included $10 billion for the American Graduation Initiative, the program that was to fund Obama’s graduation mandate. But when the bill got tied to health care reform to help health care meet the cost-savings requirements of reconciliation, that $10 billion got knocked down to a meager $2 billion. Giving more money to community colleges would have thrown off the overall savings needed to help health care stay afloat.

I agree with Andy that not offering any federal funding to community colleges would be tantamount to Obama selling out on the working class, but I’m hopeful that the funding will come through soon in another form. I don’t think the president has forgotten how much community colleges are hurting. Plus, had student loan reform not been tied to health care, it likely would have remained in legislative limbo. House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller (D-Calif.) had been working on student loan reform for years. And reform minus promised additional funding for community colleges still seems like a better deal than no student loan reform and no money for community colleges.  


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend