Something Rotten in the State of Denmark?

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

After all my blogging about the relative peachiness of climate politics in Denmark, over the weekend the story broke that the country’s lead negotiator has resigned.

Thomas Becker, deputy permanent secretary in the Ministry for Climate and Energy and Minister Connie Hedegaard’s “right hand man,” quit his post on Friday—apparently not long after we were hearing from Hedegaard about how much agreement there is on climate policy in Denmark. The Danish press is speculating that the departure is the result of a rift between Becker’s views and those of the new Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen. Becker is said to have wanted the country to stake out a more aggressive position on climate than the PM’s office is willing to back.

Hedegaard said on Danish television that his exit is “purely an administrative matter.” Becker will apparently be replaced with senior diplomat Steffen Smidt. From Reuters:

The move so close to the Dec. 7-18 meeting coincided with growing worries about whether governments will reach a deal after talks in Bangkok made little progress. Only one more meeting, in Barcelona next month, remains before negotiators come to Denmark.

Although the host’s chief negotiator can wield influence as a broker behind the scenes, Denmark’s own position is tightly tied to European Union policy, and Becker’s absence was seen as unlikely to change an outcome which will be decided primarily by the big powers.

Becker is credited with the idea of holding the climate change conference, which Hedegaard will chair, in the Danish capital.

DailyKos also has an excellent piece giving context to the departure, including a translation of Hedegaard’s statement:

I don’t think I’ve ever had as close a working relation with the prime minister … I would be lying if I didn’t admit that there have been controversies; I’ve brought people from the climate ministry, they’re supposed to work with people in the prime minister’s office–it’s a clash of cultures. The pressure on all of us is extraordinary … but throwing mud like this will get us nowhere.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend