The University of California Just Sold Off $200 Million in Fossil Fuel Investments

But it’s still a small fraction of the university’s overall investments in dirty energy.

Students involved in the Fossil Free UC campaign protest for divestment.Provided by Fossil Free UC

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Environmentalists are celebrating after the University of California announced Wednesday that it had dumped $200 million worth of holdings in coal and tar sands from its massive investment fund.

Jagdeep Singh Bachher, the UC system’s chief investment officer, says the decision to sell off investments in some of the world’s dirtiest energy sources was based largely on economic considerations. Bachher cited huge declines in the coal industry and falling global oil prices, according to Reuters. Baccher added that “slowing global demand, an increasingly unfavorable regulatory environment, and a high threat of substitution pose insurmountable challenges to coal mining companies,” and that he worried about “sustainability issues” that are making oil sands investments risky, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Despite the announcement, there has been no official change in UC’s investment strategies, a university spokesperson told Reuters. That means the UC has no plans to get rid of their investments in other fossil fuels—natural gas and conventional oil—anytime soon.

Nonetheless, the news was immediately embraced by environmentalists as a big win for the divestment movement, a global campaign led by the group that is pushing major institutions to distance themselves—and their finances—from industries contributing to climate change.

“It is the largest university commitment pulling out of fossil fuels in the history of the campaign.”

“This is the first time that they are committing to do it, so it is massive—it is the largest university commitment pulling out of fossil fuels in the history of the campaign,” says Karthik Ganapathy, a spokesperson. UC has only divested from specific sectors three times before: from South African companies during apartheid, from businesses associated with the genocide in Darfur, and from tobacco companies. The school system has resisted fossil fuels divestment for years, despite ongoing student protests.

In reality, this sell-off represents a mere fraction of UC’s overall portfolio, which is valued at more than $98 billion, and it’s unclear whether it was related at all to the ongoing protests to get the university to divest. Klein told the LA Times that UC still has about $10 billion in energy industry investments, and has no plans to sell off any more.

As part of the divestment campaign, has teamed up with student groups on campuses who are taking a stand against their universities’ investment practices. Fossil Free UC, organized by students, faculty, and alumni of the UC system, has been involved since 2012. Over the past three years, student demonstrations have caused university officials to reevaluate how they were doing business, students say, and the group is now claiming some vindication.

“Students put this debate on the table,” said Avi Oved, a UCLA student who currently serves on the UC Board of Regents. The 22-year-old, who plays a role decision-making on the board, says Fossil Free UC paved the way for divestment discussions to take place.

“Students put this debate on the table,” said Avi Oved, a UC student regent.

After protests last year, UC set up a task force to investigate its investments. Though the board ultimately decided not to divest at that point, it did develop environmental, social, and governance standards that included issues like climate change, human rights, and ethics. These standards, Oved claims, helped lead to Wednesday’s announcement to ditch the coal and tar sands investments.

“These holdings were reducing in profitability, they were higher risk, and it made sense economically—as well as in the context of social responsibility—to sell them,” Oved said. “Now they are looking at the implications of carbon pricing on their holdings, and they are looking at conservation questions—even things like not investing in the gun industry.”

“There are no so many different degrees that they are taking under consideration, which were completely ignored in the past,” Oved added.

While the activists see Wednesday’s decision as a victory, they aren’t standing down. Jake Soiffer, a UC Berkeley junior who has been involved in Fossil Free UC since he first arrived on campus, says he plans to keep fighting the university’s investment practices.

“They have divested from coal and from oil sands, but the major players profiting off of environmental destruction in California are oil and natural gas. They haven’t done anything about those,” Soiffer said. “We need to be using the institutions we have access to as a platform for climate justice, and calling out the way a system has been set up to keep power in the hands of a few…and highlight how those few are wrecking our planet.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend