Japan’s Appetite for Whale Meat Wanes

A new report reveals that three-quarters of the meat from whales caught last summer did not get sold.

Whale meat for sale in Yamaguchi, Japan<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nihonbunka/21805342/in/photostream/">timtak</a>/Flickr

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

This story first appeared on the Guardian website and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

Japan’s failing appetite for whale meat left three-quarters of meat from whales caught in the northwest Pacific last summer unsold, according to a report.

Junko Sakuma, a freelance journalist, said the body responsible for selling meat from Japan’s controversial “scientific” whaling program had failed to sell 908 metric tons of the 1,211-metric-ton catch, despite holding 13 public auctions since last October.

The report, published on the website of the Tokyo-based Dolphin and Whale Action Network, said the Institute of Cetacean Research, a quasi-governmental body that oversees the hunts, had hoped to use sales from the meat to cover the costs of the whaling fleet’s expeditions.

The failure of the auctions to pique consumer interest in meat from minke, Bryde’s, and sei whales has forced the institute to revert to private sales through Kyodo Senpaku, the for-profit firm that collects, processes, and sells the meat on behalf of the institute.

Sakuma said the oversupply of whale meat, despite pockets of demand for the highest quality produce, had made Japan’s lethal research program unsustainable.

The Institute of Cetacean Research blamed low demand on the complicated auction procedure and reluctance among food suppliers to attract criticism from anti-whaling groups such as Sea Shepherd.

“We could not achieve the results we had anticipated,” an institute official told Kyodo.

Although the International Whaling Commission banned commercial whaling in 1986, Japan is allowed to conduct so-called “scientific” hunts in the northwest Pacific and the Antarctic. The IWC stipulates the meat must be processed and sold on the open market.

But campaigns to revive the tradition of eating whale meat—which was largely confined to a few coastal towns—have failed to capture the public’s imagination.

A 2006 survey by the Nippon Research Centre found that 95 percent of Japanese people never or rarely eat whale meat. Consumption of whale meat rose after the Second World War as it provided a much-needed source of protein.

Sakuma’s report will come as another blow to Japan’s beleaguered whaling industry.

Campaigners claimed a major victory when the Antarctic whaling fleet returned to port in March with just 30 percent of its planned catch of more than 900 whales. The fisheries agency blamed the poor catch on bad weather and “sabotage” by Sea Shepherd.

Late last year, it was revealed the government used 2.28 billion yen (£1.85 billion) from the March 11 earthquake recovery fund, on top of its existing $6 million (£3.87 million) annual subsidy, to pay for the most recent Antarctic hunt.

The fisheries agency said the use of the fund was justified because one of the towns destroyed by the tsunami was a whaling port.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend