Trump Responds to North Korea Weapons Test by Praising Kim Jong Un

“I am with him.”

Trump and Kim

President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un met in Hanoi in February.Evan Vucci/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

For more than a year, President Donald Trump has been boasting on Twitter that his on-again, off-again diplomacy with Kim Jong Un has convinced the North Korean dictator to halt his provocative weapons tests. In particular, Trump has cited Kim’s pledge to freeze testing of nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles as a signature foreign policy accomplishment.

So when North Korea launched a series of short-range projectiles last night, analysts wondered how Trump would respond. True, Kim had not technically broken his promise, which covered only nuclear weapons and ICMBs. But the latest test “does raise questions about how much President Trump will tolerate, and how far his trust of Kim Jong-un can stretch,” the Wilson Center’s Abraham Denmark told the New York Times.

On Saturday morning, Trump seemed to answer those questions. In a tweet, the president avoided mentioning the weapons test directly and instead declared that Kim “knows that I am with him & does not want to break his promise to me.” Trump pledged that a deal to relieve sanctions on North Korea “will happen!”

Trump’s public response stands in sharp contrast to reports about his initial reaction to the news. Alex Ward, an international security reporter at Vox, wrote that shortly after Trump was briefed on the test, one source said the president was “pissed off, like Kim fucked him over.” Ward added that last night, “senior aides were ‘urging [Trump] not to tweet anything’ until he spoke with South Korean President Moon Jae-in, who leads his own talks with North Korea to improve ties on the peninsula.”

Times analysis Saturday suggested two possible motivations for latest weapons test. First, Pyongyang might be pressuring Trump to ease sanctions on the rogue nation “by signaling that it could scuttle his biggest diplomatic achievement with the North.” More ominously, the paper noted, Kim might also be “deliberately provoking Mr. Trump into lashing out with fiery rhetoric so that the North could use that as an excuse to resume nuclear or long-range missiles.”

For now, Trump seems to be sticking with diplomacy. The president’s Saturday tweet, Ward wrote, is “about as good as we could expect at this point.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend