Federal Judge Blocks Part of Trump’s Border Wall Construction

The administration’s attempt to sidestep Congress hits a snag.

President Donald Trump visits a new section of border wall in California in April.Jacquelyn Martin/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

President Donald Trump’s rough week in federal courts continued last night with a new legal setback to his border wall. On Friday night, a federal judge in California issued a preliminary injunction to stop the Trump administration from redirecting money from the Department of Defense to build its wall along the US-Mexico border.

District Judge Haywood Gilliam, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, determined that the Trump administration had overstepped its authority when it sought to reallocate $1 billion in Pentagon funding toward the wall project without congressional approval. The ruling, which stops construction in El Paso, Texas, and Yuma, Arizona, emerged from a pair of lawsuits filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and 20 state attorneys general after Trump declared a national emergency to sidestep congressional efforts to block funding for the wall.

Judge Gilliam pointed to comments that acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney made to Fox News, in which he said that Trump’s wall “is going to get built, with or without Congress.” The notion that the president may spend federal funds without congressional approval, Gilliam wrote, “does not square with fundamental separation of powers principles dating back to the earliest days of our Republic.”

This ruling was just the latest legal setback Trump hit in the past week. As the president fights off congressional Democrats’ investigations of his financial records, federal judges in Washington, DC, and New York City allowed subpoenas of the president’s accounting firm and Deutsche Bank and Capital One to move forward. 

Trump has taken a build-at-all-costs approach to his signature proposal, even after Congress gave him only $1.4 billion for what he’s pitched a $5 billion effort to build 200 miles of wall. The Washington Post reported on Thursday that Trump repeatedly lobbied for a North Dakota construction firm led by a Republican donor to win a contract to build the wall. The president is also reportedly unhappy with how long it’s taking to build the wall as well as its proposed appearance. As the Post reported:

At the White House meeting Thursday, he said he doesn’t like the current design for the wall’s gates, suggesting that instead of the hydraulic sliding gate design, the Army Corps should consider an alternative, according to an administration official: “Why not French doors?” the president asked.

The president has not commented yet on the ruling.

Update: The president, who is on a state visit to Japan, has commented.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend