Grilled on Family Separations, Whitaker Responds, “I Appreciate Your Passion”

The acting attorney general also falsely claimed that there was “no family separation policy.”

Tom Williams/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on Friday is likely to be remembered for his defiant and repeated refusal to discuss any communications he may have had with the president regarding the Russia probe. But tucked within Whitaker’s daylong insistence that he would not “talk about my private conversations with the president of the United States” was a striking moment that appeared to lay bare the inhumanity of the Trump administration’s family separation policy.

The fiery exchange came when Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) questioned Whitaker on whether he had fully grasped the magnitude of the policy. Whitaker at one point directly challenged Jayapal by claiming that there “was no family separation policy.” (Jayapal instantly invoked a Washington Post fact-check from last year that gave that very assertion “four Pinocchios“—meaning it was an outright lie.)

“These parents were in your custody, your attorneys are prosecuting them, and your department was not tracking parents who were separated from their children,” Jayapal continued, her voice rising. “Do you know what kind of damage has been done to children and families across this country, children who will never get to see their parents again? Do you understand the magnitude of that?”

“I understand the policy of zero tolerance,” Whitaker responded, referring to the policy of prosecuting illegal border crossers that led to the separations.

“Has the Justice Department started tracking parents and legal guardians who were separated from their children at the border?” Jayapal asked. The acting attorney general responded without emotion. “Congresswoman, I appreciate your passion for this issue, and I know that you’ve been very involved on the front lines.”

The moment highlighted the deep chasm between an impassioned congresswoman decrying the cruelty of family separations and an administration official who appeared indifferent to the emotionally charged issue.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend