Bill de Blasio Just Went on Meet the Press to Slam Amazon for All the Wrong Reasons

Has his message changed? Or have his constituents?

Activists protested Amazon's presence in NYC and won.Wang Ying/Xinhua/ZUMA Wire

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Bill de Blasio became New York City’s mayor in 2014 with a bold populist message about equaling the playing field for all New Yorkers. But when it comes to arguably the most contentious debate over wealth in the city’s recent history—Amazon’s announcement, and then reversal, on opening up a heavily subsidized headquarters in Queens—de Blasio is doing something of a bizarre about-face, arguing that private interests need to be stronger in order to withstand public scrutiny.

“The minute there were criticisms, they walked away,” de Blasio argued Sunday on Meet the Press. “Amazon just took their ball and went home.”

Amazon’s decision to back out of the deal to build a campus in Queens has become something of a litmus test of progressive idealism. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), whose district includes the proposed site, celebrated the company’s reversal. “I think it’s incredible,” Ocasio-Cortez told NBC. “It shows that everyday Americans still have the power to organize and fight for their communities.”

Amazon withdrew from the deal after facing a severe backlash from communities over the millions of dollars in tax incentives politicians had brokered with the company. Opponents also worried that the project would deepen inequality in New York City, as big tech companies have been blamed for doing in places like San Francisco and Seattle.

De Blasio had championed the deal from the outset, and he’s now arguing that Amazon’s decision is “an abuse of corporate power.” In an op-ed for the New York Times published Saturday, de Blasio wrote that the deal provided a solid foundation for up to 25,000 jobs and that the company should have been able to withstand a little bit of public criticism about income inequality. “The lesson here is that corporations can’t ignore rising anger over economic inequality anymore,” de Blasio wrote. “We see that anger roiling Silicon Valley, in the rocks hurled at buses carrying tech workers from San Francisco and Oakland to office parks in the suburbs.”

Maybe the real lesson is that de Blasio’s message hasn’t changed. Instead, ordinary New Yorkers are far less willing to slowly chip away at inequality. They want to take it head on.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest