Los Angeles Teachers Explain Why They’re on Strike for Their Students

“The public schools, we’re getting left behind.”

Teachers picketed and rallied Friday as a strike against the giant Los Angeles Unified School District entered its fifth day with a new round of contract negotiations underway. Damian Dovarganes/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Tens of thousands of teachers in Los Angeles have been on strike for the past week. Negotiators for the school district and the teachers’ union have been locked in marathon negotiation sessions throughout the weekend to settle the ongoing dispute over large class sizes, money for support staff, and teacher pay.  Throughout the week leading up to Martin Luther King Day, teachers picketed for hours outside their schools, ending with a rally outside City Hall on Friday. Here’s what I heard from several teachers about the issues that concern them most and why they continue to strike.

Alma Rosa Vidaña, who participated in the city’s last teachers’ strike in 1989 and teaches special education at Panorama High School, on what brought her to the picket line: “The same reasons that brought us out in 1989—class size, pay. Unfortunately, this time we also have the charter school issue threatening us. They are siphoning funds. They are taking students. They don’t all accept English learners and special ed students.” 

Mack Scott, a special education instructor for 52nd Street Elementary School and a Los Angeles teacher for more than 30 years, on what brought him to the rally on Friday: “Solidarity. I have friends who work in middle school and high school and hearing stories about teaching AP courses and having 50 students for an AP course. That’s unreasonable to expect the teachers and students to be in those kinds of conditions.”

Elise Mejia, who teaches English to adults and is a mother of three: “We’re afraid. We can’t compete with charter schools. They have small class sizes, and the district hasn’t met that yet. We’re losing our kids to charter schools because they’re not putting their money into public schools anymore. They’re letting all these kids go. The public schools, we’re getting left behind, and with the conditions that we’re facing, how can you have 38 math students in 32 chairs?” 

Stephen Cordova, who taught at a magnet school in Marina del Rey for more than 20 years before he started at Dorsey High School in August, on what his high school needs: “I would say counselors. These kid are are suffering traumas in their lives, and who do they have to talk to? These kids need therapists. They need counselors to talk to them. This one girl told me one day, ‘Oh, sorry, I’m in a bad mood, Mr. Cordova. My dad just got sentenced to life in prison for murder.’ How do you keep track of every kid that’s going through stuff? I don’t know if it’s an option.”  

Darryl McKellar, who has been teaching in Los Angeles schools for two decades: “The system is broken…When a charter school is given carte blanche to the elementary and middle school elite, the end result is high schools suffer…So it’s broken. This is a moment in history where we hit the reset button and if that happens, the sky’s the limit. LAUSD, you owe us.” 


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend