Facebook Let These Misleading Advertisers Promote the Border Wall Fundraiser

Advertisers are supposed to disclose who paid for political messages.

Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire/ZUMA Press

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Facebook users are running sponsored political advertisements promoting the crowdfunding campaign for President Donald Trump’s border wall under misleading “Paid for by” labels. Earlier this year, Facebook similarly came under fire for the “Paid for by” labels on its political ads.

According to Facebook’s own policies, advertisers running political ads or those that have national importance are required to disclose who paid for the ad with a “Paid for by” label. To run a disclosure on Facebook, a user must submit their name to the company for approval, as well as an image of a valid driver’s license or US passport and the last four digits of their Social Security number. 

The requirement is intended to increase transparency of political advertisements and make it harder for governments to try to sway political elections in other countries through paid political advertising on Facebook.

But some users seem to have found a way around that. One page, posing as Trump but which does not appear to be officially affiliated with the president or White House, on Friday morning ran an ad linking to the GoFundMe campaign for the border wall. The “Paid for by” label on the ad was listed as “a private citizen and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.” The Facebook page offered no details into that private citizen. 

By Friday afternoon, the page appeared to have been deleted after being on the site for around 24 hours. The page had accrued 1,431 followers before it was finally removed.

Another ad, run by the page “Virginia Militia,” links to a Washington Times story about the crowdfunding efforts for the border wall, with the “Paid for by” label listed as just “Constitutional conservative.” The Virginia Militia page previously linked directly to the border wall campaign in a sponsored post, but the post was taken down for violating Facebook’s advertising policies. The Virginia Militia page offers no further details on the constitutional conservative in question.

Both of the ads with the fake labels were first spotted by Natalie Martinez at Media Matters.

The effort to crowdfund for Trump’s border wall was started earlier this week by Florida resident Brian Kolfage after congressional efforts to pass border wall appropriations had stalled. On the GoFundMe page, Kolfage, an Iraq War veteran, urges supporters to check into his background to determine that he is a “credible and a real person,” but makes no mention of the fact, discovered by NBC News, that he created the Right Wing News Facebook page as well as a network of affiliate sites that peddled conspiracy theories. Facebook pulled down Kolfage’s page in October during a purge of over 500 pages it said were created by fake accounts that often pushed misleading news.

Facebook first instituted the “Paid for by” labels in an attempt to make political ads more transparent after revelations that the Kremlin, with its Internet Research Agency, attempted to influence the 2016 presidential election by manipulating social-media platforms, including Facebook.

But lawmakers and experts sharply criticized Facebook after Vice News published two stories about how Facebook’s paid-for labeling could be easily gamed. The publication bought fakes ads and labeled them as being paid for by ISIS, Mike Pence, and all 100 US senators, all of which Facebook approved. 

“It’s clear that voluntary standards aren’t leading to real transparency and disclosure,” Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia said in a statement to Mother Jones in reaction to the misleading “Paid for by” labels. “This is why we need the Honest Ads Act,” he continued, referring to legislation he created with Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota. Their bill would hold internet companies, including Facebook, to the same set of strict standards for political advertising as other mediums like TV, radio, and print news.

Tonya Riley contributed to this article.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend