Trump Now Says He Didn’t Know Anything About Whitaker’s Anti-Mueller Comments

Not according to lots of other reporting.

Jim Loscalzo/CNP/ZUMA Wire

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Before Matthew Whitaker, now the acting attorney general, entered the Justice Department as Jeff Sessions’ chief of staff, he raised his public profile as a television pundit attacking special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe. But in a new interview on “Fox News Sunday” with Chris Wallace, President Donald Trump, an avid TV-watcher, denied knowing that Whitaker was a critic of the Russia investigation. 

“I did not know he took views on Mueller as such,” Trump told Wallace. During the segment, Fox News showed two clips of Whitaker in 2017 stating that a new attorney general could starve the Mueller probe of funding and that there was no collusion. 

Trump’s denial not only strains credulity, it also contradicts recent reporting that found it was, in fact, these exact television appearances that first endeared Whitaker to Trump, and that this demonstrable loyalty was ultimately why Trump elevated Whitaker over the next in line, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

“People close to the president said Mr. Whitaker first came to the attention of Mr. Trump because he liked watching Mr. Whitaker express skepticism about aspects of Mr. Mueller’s investigation on television,” the New York Times reported last week. Around that same time, in the summer of 2017, White House counsel Don McGahn reportedly interviewed Whitaker about a job as a “legal attack dog” against special counsel Robert Mueller, according to the Times.

Additionally, Trump let slip his familiarity with Whitaker’s position on the Mueller investigation this past Wednesday in an interview with the conservative outlet, Daily Caller. Trump responded to a question about Whitaker by bringing up Russia, a signal that his choice of attorney general is being guided by his desire to end Mueller’s work.

Sunday’s interview was not the first time Trump has tried to distance himself from Whitaker, now that there are concerns that his appointment was an attempt to obstruct justice. Back in October, Trump said, “I can tell you Matt Whitaker’s a great guy. I mean, I know Matt Whitaker.” But in November, after his appointment, Trump tweeted, “I did not know Mr. Whitaker. Likewise, as Chief, I did not know Mr. Whitaker except primarily as he traveled with A.G. Sessions. No social contact…” 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest