John Bolton Has a Baffling Excuse for Refusing to Review the Khashoggi Tape

His remarks came amid reporting that the White House is blocking a Congressional briefing on the brutal murder.

Sergei Fadeichev/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

National Security Adviser John Bolton has not listened to the tape recording of Jamal Khashoggi’s murder, a recording the CIA and Turkish officials have determined shows the Saudi crown prince personally directed the brutal killing—nor does he appear to have any intention of doing so anytime soon.

During a White House press briefing on Tuesday, the national security adviser appeared to suggest personally reviewing the tape would be futile because he didn’t speak Arabic. 

“No, I haven’t listened to it,” Bolton said . “I guess I should ask you, why do you think I should? What do you think I’ll learn from it?”

The reporter, reminding Bolton of his role as one of the nation’s top intelligence officials, said that it appeared likely that he would have access to such intelligence and would, therefore, seek to review it. Bolton responded by posing the question: “How many in this room speak Arabic?”

“You don’t have access to an interpreter?” a reporter asked.

“Well, you want me to listen to it? What am I going to learn?” he shot back. “I mean if they were speaking Korean I wouldn’t learn any more from it either.” The tense exchange continued: “I’m just trying to make the point that everybody who says ‘Why don’t you listen to the tape,’ unless you speak Arabic, what are you going to get from it?”

Bolton’s baffling justification, which appeared to stun journalists in the room, came amid new reports that the White House is blocking CIA director Gina Haspel from briefing the Senate on the Khashoggi murder. Bolton denied those reports.

Later in the briefing, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders left open the possibility that the president would meet with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman during this weekend’s upcoming G-20 summit in Argentina. She also claimed that the White House has yet to see “definitive evidence” implicating the crown prince in Khashoggi’s murder inside Saudi Arabia’s Istanbul consulate last month.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend