In New Attorney General, Trump Will Be Looking for a Loyal Defender Against Democrats

From the start, he complained that Jeff Sessions was insufficiently loyal.

President Trump and then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions at the White House in March 2017 for a listening session on the opioid epidemic. Shawn Thew/CNP via ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

In choosing his next attorney general, President Donald Trump is likely to put one qualification above the rest: loyalty to Trump. For nearly two years, Trump has wailed that Attorney General Jeff Sessions was not protecting him. Now, as special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe moves forward and Democrats in the House of Representatives gain the power to investigate Trump, he will likely select someone he views as a faithful protector of the president. 

Sessions, who resigned Wednesday at the president’s request, was by all accounts a loyal Trumpist: a foe of immigration, a tough-on-crime zealot, and a lax enforcer of civil rights laws. He wore MAGA hats and led “lock her up” chants. But Sessions failed to personally defend the president against the Russia investigation. Trump interpreted his decision to recuse himself from the investigation in the first month of his tenure as a sign of disloyalty and has been itching to get rid of him ever since.

The attorney general post was clearly a dream job for Sessions, a former prosecutor and longtime Alabama senator whose extreme positions on immigration and crime were sidelined in the Senate. As attorney general, he could singlehandedly effectuate policies that had fallen out of vogue with his Senate colleagues. But just weeks into his tenure, Sessions set the stage for his own ouster by recusing from the Russia investigation, after it was revealed that he had misled the Senate about his contact with Russian officials during the presidential campaign. Trump frequently expressed his frustration with Sessions’ recusal to aides and the press. On multiple occasions, he came to the brink of firing Sessions. Publicly, he attacked him repeatedly, calling him “beleaguered” and “weak.”

In December 2017, Trump bluntly laid out the kind of loyalty he expects from his attorney general. “I don’t want to get into loyalty, but I will tell you that, I will say this: [Attorney General Eric] Holder protected President Obama,” he told the New York Times. “Totally protected him. When you look at the IRS scandal, when you look at the guns for whatever, when you look at all of the tremendous real problems they had, not made-up problems like Russian collusion, these were real problems. When you look at the things that they did, and Holder protected the president. And I have great respect for that, I’ll be honest, I have great respect for that.”

This quote provides a glimpse of what Trump will expect from his next chief law enforcement officer: protection not only from the Russia probe but from Democrats in Congress. It’s a position that would further politicize the Justice Department. And the next attorney general will know that no matter how simpatico he or she is with Trump’s other priorities, a failure to protect the president will mean losing the job. 

Long before Trump’s election, it was clear that he prized loyalty above all other things in the people around him. His longtime fixer, Michael Cohen, claimed he would take a bullet for Trump. When Trump became president, he pressed his FBI director, James Comey, on multiple occasions to profess his loyalty. After Comey demurred, he was fired. 

The next attorney general’s loyalty will quickly be put to the test. Unlike Sessions, Trump’s next attorney general will take over supervision of Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. If Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker doesn’t fire Mueller or rein in the investigation, Sessions’ permanent replacement will be expected to wind it down. (Sessions’ final act of loyalty to Trump was that he chose to resign at Trump’s request, rather than be fired, so that Whitaker could take over with authority to oversee the Mueller investigation.)

The next attorney general will also be chosen as Trump faces investigations by Democrats now in control of the House of Representatives. Beginning in January, Democrats are likely to request Trump’s tax returns and launch investigations into his foreign business connections, some of his most controversial acts as president, and the actions of multiple Cabinet officials and federal agencies.

Trump’s loyalty requirement will go beyond protecting him. Trump believes the Justice Department should also be used to go on offense against his opponents. In response to the threat of these House investigations, Trump tweeted Wednesday that “we will likewise be forced to consider investigating them for all of the leaks of Classified Information.” He threatened to use the Senate to investigate Democrats, but the Justice Department would likely also become a weapon. Part of Sessions’ perceived disloyalty was his failure to launch more investigations against Hillary Clinton and other Democrats (though Sessions did push the bounds of his recusal by authorizing some additional inquiries into Clinton and others Democrats).

Trump’s Twitter feed provides ample evidence of the kind of political investigations the president expects from his attorney general. 

Trump also expects investigations that are detrimental to fellow Republicans to be swept under the rug. 

Trump came to office with the view that the Justice Department should be a political arm of the White House. Now, Trump will have the opportunity to bring it closer to his vision.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend