Democrats’ House Win Wasn’t About Trump, Nancy Pelosi Insists

“Health care was on the ballot, and health care won.”

Zach Gibson/Getty Images

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

In a victory lap the day after Democrats retook control of the House of Representatives, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi attributed the victory to one topic: “health care, health care, health care.” 

“Health care was on the ballot, and health care won,” she told reporters during a Wednesday briefing. “The biggest winner yesterday was health care for the American people, for our seniors, and for American families.”

The emphasis on kitchen table issues from the House’s presumptive speaker was not surprising given the focus of Democratic ads during the final midterm stretch and the successful ballot initiatives in three states to extend portions of the Affordable Care Act to 300,000 people. During Pelosi’s previous four-year term as speaker, her defining achievement was shepherding the ACA through the House. 

The prominence of health care on the stump came in direct opposition to Trump’s closing strategy—hyping an imagined threat from a migrant caravan still thousands of miles away and harping on Democratic opposition to Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination. “Public sentiment” would be Democrats’ biggest ally in the new Congress, Pelosi said. 

Rather than outline the investigations Democrats might pursue with subpoena power, Pelosi struck a conciliatory tone, saying she had spoken with Trump about addressing national infrastructure needs. Committee chairs won’t be “scattershot freelancing,” she added, referring to politically motivated actions taken outside of the committee process. (Hello, Devin Nunes.) Among the Democratic majority’s goals, Pelosi said, will be to “restore the health of our democracy” and maintain integrity in government by reducing the role of “dark money” in the electoral system.

Pelosi declined to address reports that her speakership lacks support from some freshman members, instead highlighting her skills as a negotiator and a bridge builder. “I’d rather answer questions about policy,” she said. “The rest will speak for itself.”

Listen to our journalists explain all the twists and turns of Election Day, and what comes next for America, on this special episode of the Mother Jones Podcast:


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend