Cindy Hyde-Smith Refuses to Apologize for “Public Hanging” Comment

“We put out a statement yesterday.”

Republican U.S. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippi, right, leaves a news conference Monday, Nov. 12, 2018, at the state Republican Party headquarters in Jackson, Miss.Emily Wagster Pettus/AP

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippi—who is facing a runoff to keep the seat she was appointed to earlier this year—is refusing to apologize for saying that if a local cattle rancher “invited me to a public hanging, I’d be on the front row.”

The comment, which was caught on camera by journalist and blogger Lamar White, Jr., during a campaign stop in Tupelo, has sparked an intense backlash. Mississippi has a gruesome history of lynching—from 1882 to 1968, 581 people were lynched there, more than in any other state. Hyde-Smith’s Democratic opponent, Mike Espy, is black, as are 40 percent of the state’s residents.

On Sunday night, Hyde-Smith released the following statement: “In a comment on Nov. 2, I referred to accepting an invitation to a speaking engagement. In referencing the one who invited me, I used an exaggerated expression of regard, and any attempt to turn this into a negative connotation is ridiculous.”

Not exactly an apology. 

On Monday, Hyde-Smith was repeatedly asked about the controversy at a press conference she held with Republican Gov. Phil Bryant to announce an endorsement Hyde-Smith had received from the anti-abortion National Right to Life Committee. She still refused to apologize. “We put out a statement yesterday, and we stand by that statement,” she said.

Asked to expand on what she meant by a “public hanging,” Hyde-Smith said, “We put out the statement yesterday, and it’s available, and we stand by that statement.”

“Senator, are you familiar with Mississippi’s history of lynchings?” another reporter asked.

“I put out a statement yesterday,” Hyde-Smith responded. “And that’s all I’m gonna say about it.”

Asked how her comments could have anything other than a “negative connotation,” Hyde-Smith said, “I put out a statement yesterday, and we stand by the statement, and that’s all I’m going to say about it.”

“Is that phrasing in your every-day lingo?” a reporter asked.

“I put out a statement yesterday,” she said. “We stand by the statement.”

Then, the question was put to Bryant, who had originally appointed Hyde-Smith to the seat.

“She is certainly addressing the fact that she has put out a statement,” he noted.

“I can tell you all of us in public life have said things on occasion that we could have phrased better,” Bryant added. “But I know this woman, and I know her heart. I knew it when I appointed her. I know it now. She meant no offense by that statement. There was nothing in her heart of ill will.”

Hyde-Smith silently nodded beside him. 

Bryant wasn’t done, though.

“Absolutely we have been sensitive to race relations in this state,” he said, before complaining that prominent black leaders had refused to join President Donald Trump at the grand opening of a pair of museums in Jackson, Mississippi, dedicated to the state’s history in the Civil Rights Movement. “I brought the president of the United States here to open the civil rights museum, and African-American leadership, they would fail to even come to the event, because the president of the United States was there.”

With that, Bryant sought to tie the controversy to the issue they’d come to the press conference to discuss. Bryant, who has said his goal is to end abortion in Mississippi, declared that abortion is a “genocide of over 20 million African-American children.”

“See, in my heart, I am confused about where the outrage is at about 20 million African-American children that have been aborted,” he said. “No one wants to say anything about that.”

Watch the remarks below: 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest