Stacey Abrams Fires Back After Brian Kemp Launches Last-Minute “Cyber Crimes” Probe

“He is desperate to turn the conversation away from his failures.”

Brian Cahn/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

On Sunday, the office of Brian Kemp, the Republican gubernatorial candidate in Georgia, announced that it has launched an investigation into the state’s Democratic party after a “failed attempt to hack the state’s voter registration system” had allegedly been uncovered. The move by Kemp, who as Georgia’s secretary of state oversees the enforcement of election laws, comes just two days ahead of the state’s closely-watched election for governor.

Kemp’s office did not provide any details into the alleged hacking attempt. “While we cannot comment on the specifics of an ongoing investigation, I can confirm that the Democratic Party of Georgia is under investigation for possible cyber crimes,” press secretary Candice Broce said in a brief statement. “We can also confirm that no personal data was breached and our system remains secure.”

Democrats swiftly rejected the allegations while pointing to the timing of what they condemned as a “political stunt” by Kemp. “To be very clear, Brian Kemp’s scurrilous claims are 100 percent false, and this so-called investigation was unknown to the Democratic Party of Georgia until a campaign operative in Kemp’s official office released a statement this morning,” the executive director for Georgia’s Democratic Party Rebecca DeHart said. “This political stunt from Kemp just days before the election is yet another example of why he cannot be trusted and should not be overseeing an election in which he is also a candidate for governor.”

The race between Kemp and his Democratic challenger Stacey Abrams, who stands to become the nation’s first female black governor, has drawn national attention, both for its history-making elements and Kemp’s notorious voter suppression efforts during his time as secretary of state. As recently as Friday, a federal judge ruled that thousands of voters who had been barred from voting because they were deemed ineligible by Kemp must be allowed to cast their ballot in Tuesday’s election.

Abrams on Sunday forcefully rejected the last-minute probe, calling it a “desperate” attempt to distract from his voter suppression record. “He is desperate to turn the conversation away from his failures, from his refusal to honor his commitments, and from the fact that he is part of a nationwide system of voter suppression that will not work in this election because we are going to outwork him, we’re going to outvote him, and we are going to win.

In 2016, amid growing evidence of Russia’s interference in the presidential election, Kemp notably refused help from the federal government to secure Georgia’s electronic voting system. He dismissed the assistance as an effort to “subvert the Constitution to achieve the goal of federalizing elections under the guise of security.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend