Jerry Brown Signed California’s Net Neutrality Law. One Hour Later, the DOJ Filed Suit to Invalidate It.

“This confirms that Washington is not listening to the American people.”

On Sunday night, California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the state's new net neutrality legislation into law.Ringo Chiu/ZUMA Wire

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Just one hour after California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the state’s landmark net neutrality legislation into law Sunday, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit alleging that the state’s measure “unlawfully imposes burdens on the Federal Government’s deregulatory approach to the Internet.” According to the complaint, the DOJ has requested an injunction and is seeking a declaration to permanently invalidate the law.

“Under the Constitution, states do not regulate interstate commerce—the federal government does. Once again the California legislature has enacted an extreme and illegal state law attempting to frustrate federal policy,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement Sunday night. “We are confident that we will prevail in this case—because the facts are on our side.”

The bill, SB 822, requires internet service providers to treat all data carried by their networks in the state with the same speed, regardless of the content. The bill was a response to the Federal Communications Commission’s repeal of its own Obama-era legislation that mandated internet service providers provide the same data speeds to all content. Shortly after the California bill was passed in August, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai criticized the legislation, calling it “illegal” and a preemption of federal law.

“I’m pleased the Department of Justice has filed this suit,” Pai said in a statement. “The Internet is inherently an interstate information service.” He added he was eager to work with the DOJ to “ensure the Internet remains ‘unfettered by Federal or State regulation.'”

The announcement comes less than a week after California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and 12 other attorneys general met with Sessions to discuss consumer protection and potential anti-trust actions against Big Tech. Beccerra has been an outspoken critic of the Trump White House, filing a number of lawsuits against the administration.

Becerra noted that the new law was a response to efforts by the Trump administration to undermine net neutrality. “California—home to countless start-ups, tech giants and nearly 40 million consumers—will not allow a handful of power brokers to dictate sources for information or the speed at which websites load,” Becerra said in a statement. “We remain deeply committed to protecting freedom of expression, innovation and fairness.” 

While California is the first state to be challenged for its action, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington have all adopted their own net neutrality rules. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, bills regarding net neutrality have been introduced in 30 other states, and six state governors have signed executive orders on the matter.  

Meanwhile, Congress continues to try to push through its own net neutrality legislation. In May, the Senate voted 52-47 to overturn the repeal, but the vote has stalled in the House, which Democrats hope to address should they retake the chamber in November. 

The FCC’s sole Democrat, Jessica Rosenworcel, expressed her disappointment in the DOJ’s decision: In a statement, she said, “This confirms that Washington is not listening to the American people.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend