Twitter’s CEO Says the Site Does Not Discriminate Against Conservatives

But his answers weren’t good enough for Republicans in Congress.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey testifying before Congress. Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom via ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey rolled through Congress for a pair of hearings on Wednesday, his first time testifying before Congress, and stressed in no uncertain terms that Twitter does not selectively ban conservative users. “Let me be clear about one important and foundational fact: Twitter does not use political ideology to make any decisions, whether related to ranking content on our service or how we enforce our rules,” Dorsey said in his written testimony.

That answer, however, wasn’t good enough for Republicans, who had called Wednesday’s House Energy and Commerce Committee to discuss accusations from top Republicans that the site had been “shadow-banning” and censoring conservative users. “That’s hard to stomach,” Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) said of Dorsey’s defense of Twitter. “We wouldn’t be having this discussion if there wasn’t a general agreement that your company has discriminated against conservatives.”

Barton was referring to an incident earlier this summer where the social media platform had removed 600,000 users from its search results as a result of an algorithm based on how other users, who had violated Twitter’s terms of service, interacted with the account. The incident raised alarm bells from top-level Republicans, including President Donald Trump and House Majority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), who accused the company of censoring conservatives.

Dorsey’s answers also weren’t good enough for conservative conspiracy theorists who have been permanently banned by other social media companies. Alex Jones, host of the conservative conspiracy theory website InfoWars, roamed the halls of Congress Wednesday complaining that he had been banned from Facebook and temporarily barred by Twitter. The House hearing was interrupted by Laura Loomer, a former member of Project Veritas, who accused Twitter of a coordinated effort to suppress conservatives ahead of the midterms. “President Donald Trump, help us,” Loomer yelled before being escorted out of the hearing room. “Please help us, Mr. President, before it is too late, because Jack Dorsey is trying to influence the election.”

Democrats weren’t buying the Republican complaints, and spent their question time asking why Republicans weren’t focusing on securing social media platforms from foreign actors ahead of the election. “I think it’s the height of hypocrisy,” Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) said, “for Republicans to accuse Twitter of alleged liberal bias when President Trump uses the platform every day.” 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest