Trump’s Inauguration Photos Were Cropped to Make Crowds Look Bigger, Report Says

Workers were given the impression the president wanted “pictures that appeared to depict more spectators.”

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer makes a statement during his first press conference as Press Secretary where he spoke about the media's reporting on the inauguration's crowd size. Alex Wong/Getty Images

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Shortly after his inauguration, President Donald Trump boasted about the size of the crowds in attendance, and then-press secretary Sean Spicer, in his first press conference, sided with his boss and insisted that it had been “the largest audience ever to witness an inauguration, period.”

This wasn’t true, of course, but a government photographer did his best to make it seem like it was. 

Newly released documents obtained by the Guardian show that a National Park Service photographer, following a request from the White House, cropped the official photographs to remove empty space where the crowds ended. The documents were produced as part of an Interior Department inspector general’s investigation, but the details about the edited photos were not included in the final report, released last June.

On his first day of office, Trump called then-acting NPS director Michael Reynolds at 9:30 a.m. and “asked him to provide pictures of the inauguration,” Reynolds reportedly told investigators. Spicer also repeatedly called the NPS officials that day, leading a staffer to acknowledge that Spicer had asked “for NPS to provide photographs in which it appeared the inauguration crowd filled the majority of the space in the photograph,” according to CNN

According to investigators’ notes, the message was relayed to Interior officials, including two NPS photographers who worked the inauguration. Investigators indicated that an unnamed NPS communications official “got the impression that President Trump wanted to see pictures that appeared to depict more spectators in the crowd.”

By that point, photos had circulated comparing the crowds at Trump’s inauguration to those attending President Barack Obama’s. The communications official noted that the Trump photos in the media “showed a lot of empty areas.” “She assumed that the pictures the White House was asking for needed to be cropped to show more of the crowd present at the event, but acknowledged that Reynolds did not ask for this,” according to CNN, which cited the investigators’ notes.

Following the White House request for additional photographs, a NPS photographer cropped the photos, and later told investigators he “did so to show that there had been more of a crowd.”

“He said he believed that was what [redacted] wanted him to do. He said [redacted] had not specifically asked him to crop the photographs to show more of a crowd,” according to the notes.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend