Chuck Grassley Is Furious and Full of Interruptions at Christine Blasey Ford’s Testimony

Here are some of the worst moments by the Senate Judiciary chairman.

Erin Schaff/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) kicked off Thursday’s much-anticipated testimony from Christine Blasey Ford by attacking Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s handling of a confidential letter Ford had sent to the California Democrat detailing her alleged assault, claiming it was Democrats—not Republicans—who were guilty of mistreating Ford.

As Ford waited to begin her testimony, Grassley continued by using his opening remarks to shoot down calls from Ford and Democrats for the FBI to investigate her sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. He then interrupted Feinstein during her opening remarks when she accurately pointed out Grassley had failed to properly introduce Ford.

“I was going to introduce her, but if you want to introduce her, I’d be glad to have you do that,” Grassley shot back, visibly irritated. “But I want you to know I didn’t forget to do that because I would do that just as she was about to speak.”

The interruption was the first of many by Grassley during Ford’s testimony, in which the chairman appeared defensive and highly combative toward his Democratic colleagues. At one point, he angrily rejected Sen. Dick Durbin’s (D-Ill.) charges that Republicans on the committee were blocking an FBI investigation into Ford’s allegations, pointing the finger at Democrats for what he repeatedly claimed was a mishandling of the situation. In another instance, Grassley claimed he was the one being “rudely interrupted” when Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) requested Republicans share documents that were the focus of some questions directed to Ford. 

The moments with Grassley, both tense and shocking, likely further damaged Republicans’ standing as Ford spoke publicly for the first time, in deeply emotional terms, of her sexual assault allegations against Kavanaugh. 

“What is the strongest memory you have, the strongest memory of the incident, something that you cannot forget?” Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) asked during his questioning of Ford. “Take whatever time you need.”

“Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter,” Ford said as her voice broke. “The uproarious laughter between the two and their having fun at my expense.”

Grassley’s aggression aside, many also noted that the five-minute, “female assistant” format the chairman had specifically imposed for Thursday’s hearing was also backfiring.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend