Trump Set a Record-Low Refugee Cap. Now He May Cut It in Half.

The United States’ annual refugee cap was 110,000 under Barack Obama. It could drop to 25,000.

Syrian refugees wait to register at an employment office at a refugee camp in Jordan.Raad Adayleh/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Last year, President Donald Trump cut the annual cap on the number of refugees allowed into the United States to the lowest level on record. This year’s 45,000-person limit is less than half the 111,00o-person cap set by Barack Obama in 2016. Now the Trump administration is considering nearly halving the refugee limit again.

The New York Times reports that the Trump administration may set a 25,000-person limit for the 2019 fiscal year. The push to slash refugee admissions is meeting less internal resistance than it did last year. The Times attributes the shift to White House policy adviser Stephen Miller’s success in installing anti-immigration hardliners in key positions throughout the administration.

In reality, the number of refugees admitted may be even lower, due to increasingly strict vetting requirements that make it hard for refugees to enter the country. The administration is on pace to admit fewer than half of the 45,000 refugees allowed under the 2018 cap.

The Daily Beast reported last month that the Trump administration was looking to set the 2019 refugee cap between 20,000 and 25,000 people. Barbara Strack, a former DHS official who helped oversee refugee admissions until January, told the Daily Beast, “We’ve completely abandoned leadership [on refugees] and a commitment to their protection at a time when world needs couldn’t be higher.”

The Nationalities Service Center, a Philadelphia-based organization that helps resettle refugees, has seen a steep drop in resettlement since Trump took office. Data provided by Margaret O’Sullivan, the group’s executive director, show that the NSC resettled 373 refugees in the last seven months of 2016. That dropped to 62 in the last seven months of 2017 and 52 in the first seven months of 2018.

When asked how further reducing the cap would affect refugees and their advocates, O’Sullivan said, “We know what that feel likes because that’s where we are now.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend