Trump Attacks 2 Favorite Targets in Sunday Morning Tweetstorm

Hint, one of them is the “failing New York Times.”

August 17, 2018 - Washington, District of Columbia, U.S. - President Donald J. Trump meets reporters during an impromptu press availability on the South Lawn of the White House. Ron Sachs/CNP via ZUMA Wire

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

President Donald Trump took some time off from golfing at his Bedminster, New Jersey, resort this morning to attack the “failing New York Times” for publishing a “fake piece” about “White House Councel [sic] Don McGahn” and his extraordinary cooperation with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation. In a string of angry tweets, Trump compared the special counsel to late anti-communist crusader Sen. Joseph McCarthy (R-Wisc.):

The Times reported Saturday that the White House allowed investigators to interview McGahan for nearly 30 hours over three days in the Russia inquiry, declining to assert any claims of executive privilege. Unfettered, McGahan apparently provided investigators with extensive insights into some of the most critical moments in the Trump presidency as they relate to allegations of campaign collusion with the Russians to interfere with the 2016 presidential election and its potential obstruction of justice. Those include Trump’s firing of FBI director James Comey, as well as his efforts to demand that Attorney General Jeff Sessions assume oversight of the special counsel investigation, despite Sessions’ pledge to recuse himself from the inquiry. 

The Times painted a portrait of a paranoid White House counsel under siege, seeking to save his own skin by asserting his own innocence to investigators, though not the president’s. Trump has blamed many of his legal woes on McGahn, who apparently suspected that Trump might try to throw him under the bus and blame him for possible illegal acts of obstruction of justice committed by others close to Trump—or Trump himself.

The Times suggests McGahn spilled his guts to the special counsel before that could happen. From the Times:

At the same time, Mr. Trump was blaming Mr. McGahn for his legal woes, yet encouraging him to speak to investigators. Mr. McGahn and his lawyer grew suspicious. They began telling associates that they had concluded that the president had decided to let Mr. McGahn take the fall for decisions that could be construed as obstruction of justice, like the Comey firing, by telling the special counsel that he was only following shoddy legal advice from Mr. McGahn.

Worried that Mr. Trump would ultimately blame him in the inquiry, Mr. McGahn told people he was determined to avoid the fate of the White House counsel for President Richard M. Nixon, John W. Dean, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to obstruct justice in the Watergate scandal.

Mr. McGahn decided to fully cooperate with Mr. Mueller. It was, he believed, the only choice he had to protect himself.

Trump took issue with this characterization, firing back on Twitter (with the same spelling errors):

As Mother Jones‘ Andy Kroll wrote in June last year, as White House counsel, McGahn has one main job: to protect the president. But Trump’s relationship with McGahn, one of his earliest hires during his presidential campaign, has long been strained as the former election law lawyer has attempted to guide Trump through a series of legal landmines of the president’s own making. Even then, it was clear that McGahn was failing at that job. And now, the Times suggests that despite Trump’s protests to the contrary, McGahn may have decided that at this point in the Trump administration, the only person he can really protect is himself.

For a deeper dive into the White House counsel now at the center of this controversy, see this Mother Jones story.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend