The Spike in Immigration Prosecutions Is Causing Other Crimes to Go Unpunished

Non-immigration offenses declined by 35 percent between March and June, as immigration prosecutions jumped.

Central American asylum seekers wait as Border Patrol agents take them into custody in June near McAllen, Texas. John Moore/Getty

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The Trump administration’s push to prosecute people for crossing the border without authorization is limiting the government’s ability to prosecute people who commit other crimes, according to government data obtained by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a research center at Syracuse University.


TRAC’s analysis of the data shows that the number of immigration-related prosecutions filed along the border spiked by 79 percent between March and June. During the same period, the number of non-immigration prosecutions declined by 35 percent. Non-immigration offenses accounted for just 6 percent of prosecutions in districts along the Mexican border in June, compared to 14 percent in March.

TRAC concluded that unless non-immigration crime is “suddenly less prevalent” than before, the figures imply that more non-immigration crimes in the border regions are going unprosecuted. In Arizona, for example, the data show that drug prosecutions under a statute that is usually enforced by US Customs and Border Protections have declined sharply in recent months. 

Drug prosecutions under 21 USC 846, a statute generally enforced by CBP


In June, CBP referred 11,086 new cases to the Justice Department for federal prosecution along the border with Mexico, the highest number ever, according to Sarah Pierce of the Migration Policy Institute. That was up from 9,216 in May and 6,368 in March, even though slightly more people were apprehended crossing the border in March than in June. 

The increase in immigration prosecutions accelerated after Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ announcement of a new zero-tolerance policy in April, which sought to prosecute all illegal border crossers. The administration did not in fact start prosecuting everyone caught at the border, but it did break with precedent in prosecuting parents who arrived with children. That change caused the family separation crisis by turning children into “unaccompanied minors” who were placed in the custody of the Department of Health and Human Services.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend