The Biggest Questions Hanging Over the Manafort Trial

Will he? Won’t he?

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

After months of posturing, accusations of witness tampering, and legal maneuvers, the trial of Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort is finally underway in Alexandria, Virginia. This is the first of two federal trials he’ll be facing on charges that include tax evasion and bank fraud. The specific allegations may originate from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia’s attack on the 2016 election, but it’s unlikely questions about Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election will make a cameo appearance. A top prosecutor under the special counsel has said that prosecutors “don’t intend to mention alleged collusion with the Russians.”

But, as Washington bureau chief David Corn explains in this week’s episode of the Mother Jones Podcast, Russia will always persist as the subtext because plenty of Manafort’s moves are going to be scrutinized for signs of what he does and doesn’t know about Trumpworld’s campaign antics. In the end, it will all boil down to Manafort’s willingness to strike a deal to save his skin, no matter what the final verdict will be.

Listen to the podcast below:

Consider some of these questions as the trial unfolds:

Will he flip?

Corn notes that Manafort’s lawyer has said “no way” when asked about the prospect of Manafort cutting a deal with the prosecution—at least for the moment. But there’s always a chance his loyalties might shift, depending on how the evidence presented by the prosecution alters his fortunes.

“I think right now keeping expectations low for those people who want to get into the heart of the matter of what the Trump campaign did, that’s the right way to go,” Corn says. “Even after there’s a verdict in this trial, whether he’s found guilty or not guilty, there’s still another trial to come up with. So, there’s a lot of opportunity for him to decide at some point to cut a deal.”

What does Manafort know, anyway?

Corn points to two significant items in the pile of Manafort baggage that the special counsel could find interesting. First is that Trump Tower meeting. As campaign chief, Manafort had interacted with a Russian emissary who told the Trump team—most notably his son—they would provide dirt on Hillary Clinton, which was one part of a secret Kremlin plot to defeat her. “So Manafort is in the middle of what looks like an attempt on the Trump campaign to collude,” Corn says.

Second is Manafort’s relationship to Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska. Who? Here’s how we explained the Manafort-Depripaska tangle previously in Mother Jones:

For years, Manafort had wheeled-and-dealed with Deripaska, who is very close to Vladimir Putin. But Deripaska came to believe that Manafort had cheated him out of millions of dollars in one venture. Deripaska then resorted to legal action to get his money back. So while Manafort was directing Trump’s campaign in 2016, he sent messages to Deripaska through Kilimnick, offering the oligarch private briefings on the campaign. He apparently hoped that would square him with Deripaska. It was a rather odd situation: the head of an American presidential campaign privately communicating with a Putin buddy through a former Russian intelligence officer. 

While “none of the stuff is expected to come up necessarily during the trial,” Corn says, “there’s still a lot there for special counsel Robert Mueller to dig into regarding Paul Manafort and Russia.”

Elsewhere on this week’s show, Mother Jones reporter Tim Murphy shares the tragic story of how one neglected Illinois community got caught up in Ben Carson’s crusade against fair housing—a confrontation generations in the making. Read Murphy’s investigation here.

You can subscribe to the Mother Jones Podcast using any of the following services:

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest