No, Ivanka Trump Did Not Break With Her Dad’s Family Separation Policy

A closer look at the first daughter’s remarks show she’s willing to defend—and even support—it.

Liu Jie/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Following months of tension and creating frustration both in the White House and the media, Ivanka Trump has signaled she is ready to return to the public stage as first daughter and senior adviser to the president. But her most recent attempt to step back into the limelight seems to demonstrate that Ivanka’s return to public life isn’t likely to bring any moderation to the Trump White House.

During a Thursday morning interview with Axios, the topic of the Trump administration’s policy of separating migrant families at the border was broached. Initially, it appeared that Ivanka’s stance differed from her father’s, once more feeding into the illusion that she was a voice of humanity in the administration. But her statement immediately called into question whether Ivanka grasped the timeline of the controversial policy, as hundreds of children remain separated from their families due to the government’s failure to comply with a federal judge’s order to reunify all migrant families. 

“That was a low point for me as well,” Ivanka said, referring to her father’s immigration policy as a thing of the past. “I felt very strongly about that, and I am very vehemently against family separation and the separation of parents and children.”

She then echoed troubling statements from top administration officials—who have defended the policy as a deterrent—and emphasized that the United States is a country of law and order. The first daughter also made sure to differentiate her mother’s immigration to the United States in the 1980s as legal, in contrast to today’s migrants’ efforts to enter the country to escape violence. The Trump family has used an identical explanation to defend charges of hypocrisy when Melania Trump’s immigration to the United States is questioned. 

“I am the daughter of an immigrant, my mother grew up in communist Czech Republic, but we are a country of laws,” Ivanka said on Thursday. “She came to this country legally, and we have to be very careful about incentivizing behavior that puts children at risk of being trafficked, at risk of entering this country with coyotes or making an incredibly dangerous journey alone.”

Despite the contradictory remarks, many headlines on Thursday repeated Ivanka’s purported disappointment with her father’s policy. But a closer look reveals the first daughter is willing to defend and perhaps even support it.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend