More than 400 Parents Separated from Their Children Were Potentially Deported, Trump Administration Claims

“It’s been very hard to get information.”

Cory Morse/MLive.com/AP

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Federal authorities believe that 463 parents separated from children over the age of 5 at the southern border were “not in [the] U.S.” as of Monday, July 23—potentially indicating that hundreds of parents have been deported despite a federal order to reunify families last month.

Government lawyers said in a legal filing on Monday that “case notes indicate” that these parents were no longer in the United States, and may not be eligible for reunification with their children. But the filing is vague, and it’s unclear if the parents were deported or took a voluntary departure, and whether they were removed with or without their children, according to American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Stephen Kang, a member of the legal team representing immigrant parents whose class-action lawsuit halted the Trump administration’s family separation policy last month.

Adding to the confusion, the 463 cases were still “under review”—meaning the government may not actually be certain that these parents are no longer in the country. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has so far failed to produce a list of names of deported parents. “It’s been very hard to get information,” Kang says.

Of the 2,551 children between the ages of 5 and 17 who were separated from their parents—either due to the Trump administration’s zero-tolerance policy or because federal authorities separated them for other reasons—879 so far have been reunited with their parents in ICE custody, according to the filing. An additional 538 parents have been cleared for reunification but are still waiting. Meanwhile, government lawyers maintain that 917 are potentially ineligible for reunification—some because the parent waived their right to reunification during an interview with federal authorities, while in other cases, the parent has a “prohibitive criminal record.” 

The latest numbers were released as part of a class-action lawsuit overseen by federal Judge Dana Sabraw in San Diego, who last month declared that the separation policy likely violated parents’ constitutional rights and ordered the government to reunite separated children with their parents by July 26. It remains unclear whether the federal government will meet the Thursday deadline.

ACLU lawyers are hoping for more clarity after a status call on Tuesday afternoon.

Read the filing here:

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest