Feds Charge PAC Operators With Conspiring to Defraud Conservative Donors

It’s a common problem.

political donation


Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Federal agents arrested two Arizona brothers on Thursday and charged them with operating deceptive political action committees that raised more than $50 million over the last decade. The suspects allegedly preyed mostly on small donors, pledging to use the money for such purposes as protecting conservative values, supporting law enforcement, and advocating for people with autism—even though, officials say, the PACs rarely spent much money in support of these causes.

Dozens of PACs have sprung up in recent years with tactics similar to those alleged Thursday by the Justice Department. Such PACs often use email marketing and mass-mailings to target small-dollar donors—frequently elderly ones—with fundraising pleas that appeal to issues the donors feel strongly about. These PACs often do very little to support actual candidates or causes. Instead, they tend to spend large amounts of money on payments to the PAC’s operators and on additional fundraising efforts. 

In Thursday’s case, the brothers—William and Robert Tierney—have been charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering, all felonies. The Tierneys allegedly operated six PACs and had involvement with three more that, the feds say, committed some sort of deceptive fundraising.

One of the groups the brothers ran was Grassroots Awareness PAC, which has raised about $1.3 million in the last three years, at least in part by using websites such as autismcampaign.org. The site, which is still operating, features vague claims stating that the organization is “working to…boost public awareness awareness of autism spectrum disorder, mobilize voters to advocate for Congressional action to increase federal funding for autism research and services for children with autism, support candidates for federal office, recruit new members and raise much needed financial support for our life changing efforts.” The website asks users to provide personal contact information and includes a link to other websites where people can look up their members of Congress. According to OpenSecrets.org, of the $1.2 million the PAC has spent in the last year-and-a-half, just $38,000 of it has gone to political candidates. 

According to the criminal complaint filed in federal court on Thursday, that was a fairly typical ratio for the PACs controlled by the brothers. All told, the nine PACs allegedly raised $23 million in the last three years but gave just $109,000 to political candidates. Some of the remaining money went to covering overhead, but in the last three years alone, federal investigators say the men personally pocketed at least $3.5 million. The bulk of the money went to telemarketing firms, who the Tierneys allegedly coached to bill the PACs using shell companies to hide where the money was really going.

The other PACs run by the brothers that allegedly engaged in fraudulent behavior were Americans for Law Enforcement PAC, National Campaign PAC, Voter Education PAC, Action Coalition PAC, and Protect Our Future PAC. According to the complaint, the Tierneys also had links to three other PACs: Life and Liberty PAC, Republican Majority PAC, and RightMarch.com PAC. 

“The defendants, as alleged, capitalized on the sympathy and activism of those who sought to support awareness of various causes near and dear to their hearts,” said FBI assistant director William Sweeney in a DOJ press release announcing the charges. “Instead, virtually none of the money raised was used for its intended purpose, and the so-called political action committees served as nothing more than a front for an extensive personal fundraising campaign.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend