Trump Tower Has Its Second Fire of the Year

One person died and six were injured.

A firefighter looks out the window of a damaged Trump tower apartment on April 7Craig Ruttle/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

On Saturday, a fire at Trump tower in New York City killed 67-year-old Todd Brassner, a resident of the buildingand left six firefighters injured. The blaze, which broke out on the 50th floor and was kept contained to that area, marks the second fire at Trump’s Fifth Avenue building this year. The first broke out on January 8, injuring two civilians and a firefighter, reportedly due to an electrical issue. The cause of Saturday’s fire has not yet been confirmed.

But the president took to Twitter last night to discuss the fire, saying that it was well-contained, and that the building is “well built.”

He failed to mention, however, that the residential floors of the building—which also contains Trump’s home and the offices of the Trump Organization—lack sprinklers. That’s in part thanks to Trump himself, who in the late 1990s lobbied against legislation that would have required him to install sprinklers in Trump Tower.

The New York Times reported that Trump was among the city’s developers who lobbied against a 1999 sprinkler ordinance proposed in response to two major fires in New York high-rises that together killed seven people, including three firefighters. The bill required that buildings containing four or more apartments install sprinklers in every common hallway and in each unit. Trump, the Times reported, called city officials in New York to argue that the sprinkler systems were too expensive—costing up to $4 per square foot and potentially thousands per apartment. 

After the bill’s passage, Trump reversed course, saying he had come to support the law because sprinklers make tenants feel safer, and boasting that he would be spending $3 million to install sprinklers in units at Trump World Tower, a 72-story high-rise Trump had begun constructing just before the law’s passage. But Trump’s change of heart came only after the legislation was revised to include a grandfathering provision that allowed pre-1999 buildings to forgo the sprinkler requirements unless they underwent a major renovation. 

At a Saturday press conference, the New York fire department’s commissioner Daniel Nigro, said that when Trump’s family is at Trump tower, extra fire protection is maintained. He also said that there was significant smoke damage sustained to the upper floors during Saturday’s fire. Several residents of the towers told the New York Times on Sunday that they received no orders from the building after the fire began. “When I saw the television, I thought we were finished,” said 76-year-old Lalitha Masson told the Times, adding that she called her oldest soon to say goodbye.

Another resident, Dennis Shields, told the Times that “You could smell the smoke and you could hear things falling like through the vents. It just smelled like sulfur.” Shields also said that although there were no orders to evacuate, he received a personal text message from Trump attorney Michael Cohen, whom Shields grew up with. “He said, ‘You better get out ASAP.’ That’s how I knew to get out,” Shields recalled. “Otherwise I’d still be in there.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest