A Bipartisan Group of Senators Just Scored a Big Win in the Fight to Protect Robert Mueller

Bill to prevent Trump from firing the special counsel clears a key committee.

Zhang Jun/Zumapress

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

On Thursday, four Republicans joined their Democratic colleagues on the Senate Judiciary Committee to take a major step towards formally protecting Mueller from an ouster by the president: They voted to approve legislation that would take the power to fire Robert Mueller, the special counsel running the Trump-Russia investigation, out of the president’s hands, and create a process to review a special counsel’s firing, and possibly reinstate them.  

For weeks now, President Donald Trump’s aides have dropped hints that the president is considering firing Mueller, and that Trump believes he has the authority to do so. The Special Counsel Independence and Integrity Act was proposed earlier this month, and would clarify that only a senior Justice Department official would have the authority to fire the special counsel, and only after providing written cause. The bill also requires an expedited court review of the special counsel’s termination. Should the court find that the firing was not for good cause, the special counsel must return to their job.

This bill combines two older pieces of bipartisan legislation proposed by the sponsors this past August. Neither of those proposed bills made it out of committee, making Thursday the first time lawmakers have voted to protect Mueller. The committee’s vote came the same morning that Trump, in an interview on Fox and Friends, warned that he would soon get “involved” in the work of his Justice Department—a cryptic statement that could signal Trump will try to interfere with the special counsel. 

The bill will now move to the full Senate for consideration. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said he’s opposed to bringing the bill to the Senate floor, where it is unlikely to gain the 60 votes needed to move on to the House.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend