Judge Tells Scott Walker He Can’t Block Special Elections in Wisconsin

Walker had refused to hold elections for legislative seats vacant since December.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, with Vice President Mike Pence and House Speaker Paul Ryan, speaks at the White House last July.Alex Brandon/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker must hold special elections this spring to fill two vacant state legislative seats, a judge ruled Thursday. Walker has tried to prevent the elections from taking place in two districts that could flip from Republican to Democratic control at a time of political backlash against President Donald Trump across the country. 

Walker has a “plain and positive duty” to hold the elections, ruled Dane County Circuit Court Judge Josann Reynolds, who was appointed by Walker in 2014. “To state the obvious, if the plaintiffs have a right to vote for their representatives, they must have an election to do so,” Reynolds said from the bench.

Two Republican members—Sen. Frank Lasee and Rep. Keith Ripp—left the legislature in December to join Walker’s administration, but the governor refused to schedule special elections, claiming they would be a waste of money since the legislature was set to adjourn in March. A Democratic group led by former Attorney General Eric Holder sued the governor on behalf of Wisconsin voters in the two districts, noting that the Wisconsin constitution says legislative vacancies “shall be filled as promptly as possible by special election.” Holder called Walker’s refusal to hold the elections “an affront to representative democracy.”

Voters from the two districts testified in court that they had been denied representation as a result. “We have nobody representing the interests of our Senate district right now and that upsets me,” said Jennifer Meyer of the town of Scott, near Green Bay, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “We’re entitled to representation.” 

“I think it’s important that voters have a voice in their government,” said another voter, Desiree Frank, from Fond Du Lac County.

The attorney for the plaintiffs, Elisabeth Frost, called it “textbook voter disenfranchisement,” according to the Associated Press. “I can’t imagine a more clear case of disenfranchisement of the right to vote,” she said. The judge agreed.

The political tide in Wisconsin appears to be turning toward Democrats, after Trump notched a surprise victory there in 2016. In January, Democrat Patty Schachtner scored a shocking upset in northwest Wisconsin, winning a special election for a state Senate seat by 11 points. The district had been in Republican hands since 2000 and was carried by Trump by 17 points in 2016. Wisconsin Democrats said Walker was refusing to hold special elections for the two vacant legislative seats because he was afraid Democrats would win them, too.

The ruling said Walker must issue an order within a week scheduling the elections. 


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend