Here’s What Donald Trump Could Do If He Really Wants to Stop Amazon’s Abuses

Maybe just don’t tell him it would also really help the company’s workers.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

President Trump ramped up his attacks against Amazon on Thursday, tweeting that he has long had “concerns” about the online retailer, even before the election. His apparent beef is that Amazon does not pay enough taxes, (supposedly) uses the US Postal Service at the nation’s expense, and drives other retailers out of business. Today’s tirade spared the Washington Post, which is owned by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and is another popular target of Trump’s Twitter attacks. 

The tweet comes a day after Axios reported that the president is “obsessed” with the company, and after Amazon’s stock values dipped slightly. “He’s wondered aloud if there may be any way to go after Amazon with antitrust or competition law,” one source told Axios. The publication notes, “Trump tells people Amazon has gotten a free ride from taxpayers.” 

But, to the surprise of just about no one, Trump is tweeting without taking any action. That said, he could do quite a lot to stop some of Amazon’s well-documented abuses—such as grueling conditions for warehouse workers—and help its more than 500,000 employees.  Lucky for him, labor unions like the Service Employees International Union have already thought about how the retail behemoth’s power could be checked. Here, they tell Mother Jones about what they’d like to see from Trump on Amazon:

Despite agreeing with some of Trump’s concerns about Amazon, the SEIU doesn’t really expect Trump will follow through. Erin Sroka, communications director at SEIU Local 6 in Seattle, where Amazon’s headquarters are located, says they “don’t trust Trump to do well by workers.”

“He is very much pro-business,” says Greg Ramirez, SEIU6 director of internal organizing, who is working to unionize about 800 contracted security officers at Amazon headquarters. “And when you are pro-business, a lot of times, you don’t tend to be pro-worker.”

The union also isn’t holding its breath Trump will take action.

“I think until then,” Sroka, says, “it’s just empty tweets.” 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest